Ah, I see the debate continues, some new material too. Voodoo even. Threats of macho macho and challenges to manhood? This does not constitute an argument and even lacks an entertaining quality.

Still waiting to see a valid argument as to why Creationism would have to reject evolution in any way shape or form. It is a mystery to me as to how it even excludes the theory.

Isn't natural selection just a small equation towards the change in evolution? It has always been my belief that the factors that lead to change in mutation or selective processes are as random and varied in nature as nature itself.

Adaptation for survival would probably be the biggest ingredient towards change in evolution. Although I would have to agree with jcl that the change is a gradual process in any case.