Quote:

---

or even more funny, the idea that there should be records going back 500,000 years :0 ..that's called crank reasoning.

---

But Why? The "evolutionist" of the world must ignore certain facts in order to keep their theory alive. Why is it "crank" reasoning? We know, for example, that early man used rock carvings for art and communication, so why not earlier than the Egyptians then, huh? What about the Aztecs? Even the ancient Egyptians used "Hieroglyphics" in stone, so where are the other peoples before them??? There are no other earlier carvings!

No offense Matt, but there are no other carvings, because there were no other peoples before them, thus showing and proving that early man like evolutionist claim did not even exist. A person has to "assume" that any other prior peoples could not carve things into stone, which is a major assumption and is indeed quite illogical.

Quote:

---

Most of the other arguments dont really warrant mention, as they have been dealt with before, or are completely insane, such as the Missippi Delta one (who came up with that??),

---

Well then EXPLAIN IT!
At the rate of errosion, then after millions of years the delta would be very huge indeed! Right? Why is it that at the present rate of errosion, that it represents a few thousand years only? Why? Is it just a coincidence then?

Please don't ignore the facts of nature when assuming that certain theories are correct buddy.

FYI, We have real facts on our side and not just a few bogus scientific claims.