I also think common sense is part of the scientific argument.

Evolution needs a universe to operate in. Even if we accept the age of the universe we still need to determine where the universe came from.

Quantum fluctuations explain that the universe could have been created from almost nothing , but true ex nihilo creation is not "almost nothing". There had to be time and space to begin with, the quantum fluctuations need to come from somewhere. Science still needs to figure out where time and space came from, they need to find out where the quantum fluctuations come from.

Nothing can come from nothing.

"What about God?" You say, He must have come from nothing, so therefore your logic fails there also"

That line of reasoning doesnt work for two reasons.

1)The most important reason is that it provides absolutely no answer to the question that was asked. Having someone explain the origination of God doesnt do anything to help science figure out how the universe came into existence. It has nothing to do with the issue at hand, if science supposes that the universe came from nothing then they should show the proof. The proof is not in the speculation of how God came into being.

2)It is comparing apples with oranges. We are trying to determine the origins of matter,time and space. The biblical definition of God clearly states Him as a being outside of matter, time and space.