i dont mind the strong coding powers of gs. you can see that jcl and co can code and that they know how to manage programming. coding was never the problem with gs and i suggest keeping it a strong point.
the issue is just that there is no development noticable in other areas at all.

i agree totaly with whats said above. in the beginning years you had to code to create simple 3d models (still have a lightwave version of that at home), but times change and so should tools.

and a lot of people think so right now about the engine. its not just the oppinion of a few nutheads.
as far as i am concerned i would love to see this engine gain its power again step by step. unlike a lot of other engines this one would be worth the hussle.

its about time that something is done. and sometimes its smarter to raise from the ashes then dragging dead horses arround the city. rethink the concept of gs. because there is nothing 6-9months of development couldnt change here dramaticly.

cheers