Firstly, theres no proof to be found on the DRY part of the world, and we havent checked the wet part.
Secondly, the bible (probably) says 'worldwide' flood, which is different to
'planetwide' flood. Check a dictionary for World and you'll find something
like "A part of the earth and its inhabitants as known at a given period in history".
So World meant "everything we know of", thats different to planetwide.
Who is the say that the flood needed more water? Land can sink, and anyone on it
would be shouting "FLOOD!!", not "SUBSIDENCE!!".
AND, who is to say that the 'land' that the Ark landed on wasnt newly created
by God so his refugees could have a clean start, or even just old sea-bed that
had risen from the depths.
Hmm. Could be. But it is most likely that the whole Noah story is based at the story of a farmer and his farm animals. And the flood was just something very local, and the Ark was a normal fisher boat. That would make most sense in case it ever happened at all. Religions tends to blow up storys to make them more interesting so that they can use it for their purposes. Ooh, look, a sign, a wonder. Now look how powerful our god is ...
What counts in the end are facts. No ark found yet, no proof for that story to be true. It's the opposite, all the facts points away from that story
