So I take it that you dont see design in living organisms or the way the universe works?
Or that the existence of proteins is impossible outside of the cell?

Those are honest questions, I am not trying to be smart with you.
As I said I used to be an evolutionist so I understand the arguments, I do.
Im no longer convinced by them however. I see it as smoke and mirrors....sorry

I orriginally posted into this thread to make the point that to state that the article is a proof for evolution is to grossly overstate what the evidence shows. Regardless of how much evidence anyone else claims, for or against evolution/creation, that statement, I feel is still true. It prooves adaptation (or micro evolution as another poster called it).....Yes. But it prooves evolution.....No way.
In a court of law it would be called circumstantial evidence and thrown out.
Not that a court of law is always correct, but the point remains, it is not proof.
By the way, good to see you here Tiles, I see you have returned as I have (at least for now, probably forever)