Probably you did not get my point
Maybe , evolutionism can not be proved beyond any reasonable doubt
It is ridicoulus to expect that this theory may have the same evidence as the physical laws
The point is that creationism can be refuted beyond any reasonable doubt
Since there are two only alternatives , evolutionism is the true theory
Right. Because it makes much more sense to believe that matter created itself and then evolved into a dinosaur
You mixed up two topics a) the existance of matter b) the existance of life
the former is not a mistery any more for modern physics
According to the Heisemberg's principle of indetermination " the existance " is a natural state
It seems a paradox but the "non existance" needs a destructor rather than " the existance " a creator "
Obviusly it is not an intuitive claim but it is supported by lab evidences
The latter is still a mistery since nobody can explain how a bulk of molecules can turn into a living organism
The mere chance is definitly excluded even taking into account milion years and bilion stars
I ask you a question
Given for granted assumption a) Suppose that in a near future scientists can create in lab,living organisms
Would you change your mind ?
