I assumed you meant that human evolution was better than a designer's evolution...
You say that the perfection of nature is a lie, however, as I tried to explain to you, the genome is deteriorating from a starting point of perfection.
You undertood correctly even though I mixed up two different topics
# Topic 1
Human body produces insuline
Human beings do it much better
Nobody can distinguish natural and artificial insuline but human procedure takes a fraction of energy consumption
# Topic 2
Eyes are supposed to be highly sophisticated devices
Of course they are, but...
The bottom of eye is made of "sensors" trasducing the photons of light into an electromagnetic signal and "wires" trasmitting the signal to optical nerve
You would expect that sensors are in the front part while wires are in the rear part of the eye
The direct opposite
In the middle of the retin there is a small hole
The "wires" must pass through this hole to reach the optical nerve, covering the "sensors"
Please spare me from a remark such as " There is a reason but we dont know "
Some animals have sensors and wires in the right position and their sight is much more efficient than ours
There are a plenty of examples such as # 1 and # 2
No I wont make a list for you, read a book from time to time
Genetic devolution ?
Do you seriously mean that Adam and Eve produced insuline in an efficient way ( same as human beings in lab, nowadays ) and their eyes were as good as the ones of the eagles ?
Come on...
There is no designer, it is evident
