I tend to disagree, because exactly this should ring a bell;
Quote:
found none that suited him as a proper companion
At the moment I can't check the exact lines in the bible, so perhaps it's a bit more vague indeed. However, they didn't even discover they were actually naked but did have sex right? (they had not eaten from the apples?) I'd say 'companion' does indicate 'sexual partner'.
Quote:
That they have sex is basically coincidental in the grand scheme of things, as far as I see it.
Well, I know from my experience that sex is never coincidental. Besides that, weren't they going crazy like rabbits anyways, judging from the huge amount of children they must have created? (one thing that's clearly impossible gene-wise)
Cheers
