Regarding workshop 6. Is it recomended then to train it separate for each asset?

In may case, I am actually not sure which inefficiency I want to trade. I expect that diferent assest have mostly one of all possible inefficiencies and therefore they produce better results by usind the same oscillator in different ways. Ir order to find out if it is better to trade peaks/valleys or thresholds or the combination of both, I wonder which is the best way to compare all different algos that can be created with the same oscillator.

Training assets separately gives you only an advantage with the free version, since you can then train several assets in parallel. With Zorro S you can just activate multiple cores.

I guess what you mean here is you want to find out the most "tradable" assets for your algo, am I right? I have same curiosity. Any progress?

This way, one will get a .fac for each asset, can we simple append all .fac together, then trade all algo/asset components in a combined script?

Do I take it right?

Thanks