Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
Trading Journey
by M_D. 04/26/24 20:22
Help with plotting multiple ZigZag
by M_D. 04/26/24 20:03
Data from CSV not parsed correctly
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:18
M1 Oversampling
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:12
Why Zorro supports up to 72 cores?
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:09
Eigenwerbung
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:08
MT5 bridge not working on MT5 v. 5 build 4160
by EternallyCurious. 04/25/24 20:49
Zorro FIX plugin - Experimental
by flink. 04/21/24 07:12
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
The Bible Game
A psychological thriller game
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (AndrewAMD), 816 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
wandaluciaia, Mega_Rod, EternallyCurious, howardR, 11honza11
19049 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rating: 5
Page 1 of 24 1 2 3 23 24
Votes for future features #446748
10/30/14 06:35
10/30/14 06:35
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
B
boatman Offline OP
Senior Member
boatman  Offline OP
Senior Member
B

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
Here is my vote for the priority of the next Zorro features:
1. Interactive Brokers API plugin
2. Historical price tick data for backtests
2. FIX API plugin
3. Plot functions for MT4 chart windows

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #452736
06/23/15 16:17
06/23/15 16:17
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
J
jmb Offline
Newbie
jmb  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
I'd like to second the vote for the Interactive Brokers API plugin for the next Zorro, please!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #453281
07/16/15 09:07
07/16/15 09:07
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4
J
JobTick Offline
Guest
JobTick  Offline
Guest
J

Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4
Oanda fxtrade rest api plugin

Re: Votes for future features [Re: JobTick] #453286
07/16/15 15:47
07/16/15 15:47
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 41
K
killerkhan Offline
Newbie
killerkhan  Offline
Newbie
K

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 41
1. FIX API plugin
2. Interactive Brokers API plugin

need to get off the FXCM broker

Re: Votes for future features [Re: killerkhan] #453288
07/16/15 21:29
07/16/15 21:29
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
D
DdlV Offline
Serious User
DdlV  Offline
Serious User
D

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
Hi jcl. Further to the posts above and your reply to JobTick in the Starting... section:

The Broker Interface page in the manual for a long time has had this:

Code:
FXCM is rather honest (at least for a broker) and offers free historical price data, a free API, no commissions, and no minimum monthly investments. We found no other broker with this easy access.



This statement was written a (relatively, given how long Zorro has existed) long time ago, 2015 (so far) has brought changes to FXCM, other brokers have no doubt changed as well, etc. Given all that and the obvious interest here in other brokers, a couple of questions:

1) Does the Zorro team still feel the same way about FXCM vs. other brokers?

2) Given the flexibility currently provided by the MT4 plugin to go to pretty much any broker, does the Zorro team have "good feelings" laugh about any other broker(s)? (Actually, I suppose there's a U.S. vs. non-U.S. aspect to this also...)

Thanks.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: DdlV] #453289
07/16/15 21:47
07/16/15 21:47
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Both Interactive Brokers and Oanda support FIX API, so with this feature I guess most requirements concerning "access to another broker but FXCM and no MT4" should be satisfied. And there are still many other brokers to which you can connect via the FIX standard, so this would surely add a lot of flexibility to Zorro.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #453290
07/17/15 03:28
07/17/15 03:28
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 181
R
RTG Offline
Member
RTG  Offline
Member
R

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 181
I vote for the IB API as number 1 priority also.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: RTG] #453292
07/17/15 07:51
07/17/15 07:51
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Ok, I understand the arguments. We'll make other brokers a higher priority and will order some broker plugins for the next updates, like 1.36 or 1.38.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #453296
07/17/15 13:08
07/17/15 13:08
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
D
DdlV Offline
Serious User
DdlV  Offline
Serious User
D

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
Thanks jcl!

Based on Sphin's comments the FIX API seems the way to go to add a number of other brokers with 1 effort? Assuming each broker's "support" of FIX API is what it should be...

Maybe you can even get some of these brokers to throw in "new client" bonuses for us?! laugh

Thanks.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #453297
07/17/15 13:14
07/17/15 13:14
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Spain
yosoytrader Offline
Junior Member
yosoytrader  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Spain
Hi

my future request goes to Interactive Brokers API, due to its broad number of instruments including stocks, futures, cfds,...my interest is in stocks, as they're not included in small forex brokers,

Cheers

Re: Votes for future features [Re: yosoytrader] #453901
08/18/15 13:25
08/18/15 13:25
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
First I want to thank you repeatedly for bringing Binary Options to Zorro!

I would appreciate if I could re-enable Spread for Binaries, because

a) many Brokers "protect" (=cheat) themselves against too successful traders with a spread
b) there are hybrid binary options (I've seen theese at dukascopy) that have spread (and a higher payout in return).

With longer term expiry times, there shouldn't be much difference with the performance, but with 60s Options, a 1Pip spread will probably make a significant difference. It would be interesting to see, how much room for broker cheating your strategy has until you fall below break even.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #453934
08/19/15 11:41
08/19/15 11:41
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Ok, I'll put re-activating Spread for binary options on my list.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #453982
08/22/15 02:25
08/22/15 02:25
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 123
Mithrandir77 Offline
Member
Mithrandir77  Offline
Member

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 123
I have been looking forward to implement some API, and I have been recently reading the documentation of the Interactive Broker API and apparently their 'API' is an API to their trading client, the TWS (trading workstation). That is you have to execute TWS and then you can automate it with their API. Alternatively, you can run the IB gateway but still it is not the same kind of API as the API from FXCM.

jcl, what are your thoughts on this? For reference:

https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/software/api/apiguide/c/ctutorial_connecttotws.htm
https://www.interactivebrokers.com/download/newMark/PDFs/gateway.pdf

PS: On the other hand Oanda -was the one as dukascopy that didn't charge traders for negative equity after eurchf peg removal wasn't?- has a rest API that for what I read, would allow to make a true API to use with Zorro. I will delve into it meanwhile.

PS2: I found this documentation from ninja trader that shows that their development team implemented the interactive brokers 'api' using the TWS, that is, a third party...Is this acceptable for Zorro?

Last edited by Mithrandir77; 08/22/15 02:31.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mithrandir77] #454568
09/10/15 14:10
09/10/15 14:10
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
I think Economic News Awareness could be a powerfull addition. It could even add some fundamental Trading to the 100% technical approach as it is right now, or at least avoid some losses (don't open new Trades just right before NFP report or potential Rate Changes).

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #454591
09/11/15 07:01
09/11/15 07:01
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 45
Italy
forexcoder Offline
Newbie
forexcoder  Offline
Newbie

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 45
Italy
One great thing to insert in Zorro, could be Option trading (not binary but plain vanilla)!!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #458221
02/27/16 19:11
02/27/16 19:11
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 11
parrondo Offline
Newbie
parrondo  Offline
Newbie

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 11
My priority vote:

1)OpenMAMA bridge for market data. This is a lightweight vendor-neutral integration layer for systems built on top of a variety of message orientated middlewares. In this way Zorro could be part of a modular modern platform and expand the visibility of Zorro.

2)FIX API for order routing and trades.

3)Drawdown alert by comparison with the backtest equity curve through the Cold Blood Index. It is very important to get a prompt feeling of when our strategies are not performing fine enought. This is probably the trader's most difficult task: when to retreat from battle.

4)Dukascopy api bridge. This broker has a free good price history, fair commisions, high speed execution and java API which could expand Zorro capabilities with the huge java universe.

Thank you. Really great Job! laugh

Re: Votes for future features [Re: parrondo] #458228
02/28/16 11:05
02/28/16 11:05
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
I go for parrondo suggestions.
I would add
5- Verifying script correctness by comparing live results with a backtest of the same period. It is a quick way to know that the strategy is well developed.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: parrondo] #458237
02/28/16 19:25
02/28/16 19:25
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
B
boatman Offline OP
Senior Member
boatman  Offline OP
Senior Member
B

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
+1 for the FIX API!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #458288
03/02/16 22:52
03/02/16 22:52
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
I vote for a chance to save the trading statistics over a restart of a strategy, so that its results can be continued.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #458296
03/03/16 11:04
03/03/16 11:04
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
Good point Sphin

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #458322
03/04/16 09:47
03/04/16 09:47
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Thanks for the suggestions! All are noted.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #458449
03/10/16 16:21
03/10/16 16:21
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
J
jmb Offline
Newbie
jmb  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
I'd like to suggest a script wizard. I mentioned this under the Z Systems forum header earlier.

I suggest this for the following reasons:

1 - It's very important for the future of Zorro as a whole to attract new users.

2 - The majority of them will not be programmers, but will have many good ideas.

Therefore 2 feeds back into 1, with one proviso; new users of mixed programming ability can get started quickly with their ideas in Zorro.

Further, I'd like to suggest that you might consider asking Radoslav, the creator of fxDreema for MetaTrader, if he'd like to develop or migrate a tool? He's based in Bulgaria. My experience of this product has been very positive.

New users are your life-blood, and making access to Zorro easy with a wizard, amongst others, is a vital ingredient.

Thanks for an excellent product, which I hope continues to grow and improve.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jmb] #458452
03/10/16 16:41
03/10/16 16:41
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I'm a bit sceptical about script wizards, but I've contacted Radoslav. If he wants to do a Zorro version of fxDreema, we'll certainly support that.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #458456
03/10/16 19:06
03/10/16 19:06
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 122
V
Veratyr Offline
Member
Veratyr  Offline
Member
V

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 122
I'd like to suggest a "Zorro Protocol" broker plugin. What I envision is:

- Zorro will support a basic TCP protocol and act as a client.

- Potential broker plugin developers who do not wish to write C++ plugins (there are a lot of developers who don't write C++ on Windows) can instead write Zorro bridge servers to brokers. Brokers can potentially deploy these servers or implement Zorro's protocol themselves if they wish.

- Zorro gets wider broker support and developer attention.

- Zorro can be listed as a partner gaining a little publicity.

I came up with this after trying to implement the Spotware Connect API. While it's relatively easy to communicate with the Spotware API (I have near zero C++ experience but managed to hack together a client for their TCP API with Boost::ASIO in a weekend), doing so while subjected to Zorro's constraints is extremely difficult.

It'd make my life much easier if I could just write a small server in Go/Python/Java/Javascript/C#/F#/non-Windows C++ and point Zorro at it.

On a related note, I'd also like to suggest a Spotware Connect broker plugin. Their APIs (there's a HTTP/JSON API for account data and historical ticks and a TCP API for live prices and trading) are well designed and easy to work with and implementing the one plugin gives you access to every broker that supports cTrader (there appear to be ~15 of them). I can share the code I hacked together to work with it if it's handy.

Last edited by Veratyr; 03/10/16 20:31.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Veratyr] #459444
05/20/16 08:51
05/20/16 08:51
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
pcz Offline
Member
pcz  Offline
Member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
My priority vote:

1. FIX API - because there's no other way to go for many professional traders.
2. Dukascopy connectivity - because of their tick data history. I tried many different data sources and Dukascopy is one of the better ones.
3. Real (variable) spread simulation - for me it's very important as we make thousands of trades per week, each with very small edge. Thus we need to test on our broker's data and with absolute precision. Sometimes the trades tend to cluster during certain hours when the spread is bigger and this alone can make all the difference between profitable and unprofitable system.

But maybe the variable spread simulation is possible even now with your own data source? I imagine you could create one asset from ask prices, one artificial asset from bid prices and subtract them during backtest to get the real spread. Is it the way to go?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: pcz] #459489
05/24/16 01:31
05/24/16 01:31
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
B
boatman Offline OP
Senior Member
boatman  Offline OP
Senior Member
B

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
+1 for FIX API

pcz, you can hack a variable spread by doing something like:
Code:
if(between(hour(), 8, 9) Spread = 0.3*PIP;
else if(between(hour(), 9, 10) Spread = 0.5*PIP;
...
etc


Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #459581
05/26/16 14:05
05/26/16 14:05
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
pcz Offline
Member
pcz  Offline
Member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
Hey boatman!

Thank you for the tip. To have the maximum possible precision I think it's better to have spread for each tick. This is my current solution: Backtesting with T1 data and variable spread

(so I take back the 3rd point from my priority vote as it is apperently already possible with currently available tools laugh )

Cheers!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: pcz] #459624
05/29/16 06:57
05/29/16 06:57
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Support and resistance indicator. It can be done, I'm using a commercial S&R indicator for Metatrader when I'm trading manually, and it totally rocks: http://www.pointzero-trading.com/Products/view/PZSupportResistance
The asirikuy guy spent some time on it and developed some ideas in 2011 as well:
http://mechanicalforex.com/2011/06/intro...sistance-o.html

I think this would be an extremely valuable extension in zorro, because S&R / price action is what the big market movers like banks and funds trade. It's extremely reliable compared to technical indicators.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #459671
05/30/16 14:48
05/30/16 14:48
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I do not know a reliable S&R algorithm, and am not even 100% sure that such a thing as S&R exists at all. But there are lots of different ways to define S&R indicators. So if you can describe a method that works, just let me know - I'm certainly interested. The blog post by Daniel in 2011 did not lead to a profitable system.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #459673
05/30/16 15:19
05/30/16 15:19
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 5
W
wingt Offline
Newbie
wingt  Offline
Newbie
W

Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 5
Hi!
Could you provide an ability to change plot's color depending on its value (like Tradestation does)?
It would be very helpful, e.g. for Swamicharts drawing.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: wingt] #459755
06/03/16 00:52
06/03/16 00:52
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
As far as I know a logout and trade again of a strategy means the beginning of the statistical results of the performance report. I think someone posted already that it the performance report of htm file remains the same. Or, is there a way to keep the old htm performance report after stop and trade a strategy?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #459787
06/04/16 13:52
06/04/16 13:52
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 5
O
Opentrades Offline
Newbie
Opentrades  Offline
Newbie
O

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 5
I would like to vote for a color coding option on the main window, too! That means to allow different background colors dependent on a logical value or something like this.

A current problem for me is to draw dots and triangles on the main window when other windows (using the 'NEW' option of the plot command) are opened. The dots and triangles are always drawn on the last window, not the main window. Any suggestions how to solve that?
regards,
Opentrades

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Opentrades] #461455
08/06/16 16:00
08/06/16 16:00
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
T
traderbot33 Offline
Newbie
traderbot33  Offline
Newbie
T

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
I would like to vote for support of MetaTrader 5. For some reason, all brokers in my country works only with MetaTrader 5.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: traderbot33] #461459
08/06/16 18:01
08/06/16 18:01
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Where are you from? MT5 support is already on the todo for a future version -> http://zorro-project.com/manual/en/new.htm.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #461469
08/07/16 21:39
08/07/16 21:39
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
T
traderbot33 Offline
Newbie
traderbot33  Offline
Newbie
T

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 13
Hi,

I am from Brazil.
I had already seen the todo list for a future version. Just thought that my vote could speed up things a little bit. ;-)
I´ve seen somewhere that MT5 was planned for the version after 1.46, but it was not included in the current beta version.

Looking forward for that future release.

Thanks,

Re: Votes for future features [Re: traderbot33] #461482
08/08/16 08:02
08/08/16 08:02
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Yes, it's on the To Do list, but won't make it into the next update. It's now scheduled for 1.52. Depending on contract work the priority of features can change from time to time.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #462300
09/19/16 22:58
09/19/16 22:58
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
I remember up to 1.47 one could read on 'What's new' under 'Planned for future Zorro versions':
Quote:
Verifying script correctness by comparing live results with a backtest of the same period

latest in addiotn with 'in development' before it suddenly disappeared. Why? IMO this would be a very interesting and important feature.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #462305
09/20/16 10:57
09/20/16 10:57
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
An implemented feature is naturally not planned for a future Zorro version anymore.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #462315
09/20/16 17:30
09/20/16 17:30
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Quote:
Numbers can be passed to the Command variable via command line.

Ok, that this feature links to a 'Retest' possibility was not obvious. Very well hidden! laugh

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #463207
11/21/16 18:43
11/21/16 18:43
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Sweden
M
magpern Offline
Newbie
magpern  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Sweden
I have made an MT4 to etoro bridge to use with etoro (www.etoro.com). I never got around to use it, but I still have the code.
Would there be any interest in having an etoro API for Zorro?
It is not a "mouse clicker" it uses JSON calls to access the etoro platform.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #463363
11/30/16 05:07
11/30/16 05:07
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 103
NSW
V
vinsom Offline
Member
vinsom  Offline
Member
V

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 103
NSW
As a new feature I would like to see a WFO for factors too.
At the moment there is only for parameters.

Thanks
Vincenzo

Re: Votes for future features [Re: vinsom] #463406
12/02/16 11:05
12/02/16 11:05
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
pcz Offline
Member
pcz  Offline
Member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
Would it be possible to increase the precision of price representation in trade spreadsheets? It would be much easier to find potential bugs. I've checked the new beta and it's still only 4 decimal places for lets say EUR/USD.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: pcz] #463410
12/02/16 14:56
12/02/16 14:56
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Ok, 5 digits should be easy to implement.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Veratyr] #463539
12/11/16 15:12
12/11/16 15:12
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 12
New South Wales
C
CaptainChezza Offline
Newbie
CaptainChezza  Offline
Newbie
C

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 12
New South Wales
Hey Veratyr,
Did you read this?
http://www.spotware.com/about/news-updat...der-account/789

I read that and got excited, then posted the question here:
http://www.opserver.de/ubb7/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=55832&Number=463538#Post463538

I'd be really interested to see what you have coded up.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: CaptainChezza] #463556
12/12/16 17:03
12/12/16 17:03
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
M
Mucko Offline
Newbie
Mucko  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
JCL:

I would strongly suggest adding the ability to live populate a grid/excel type sheet with historical and live data for portfolio testing. TS has this ability in RadarScreen and MultiCharts does as well.

As soon as you have a portfolio of symbols trading it becomes very important to know certain info in real time. All are easy to program but are not easy to view in real time without real time grid output of some sort. Outputting to CSV is ok to some degree but with that method you cannot view live data and trading action to debug/improve the strategy which is designed to run over multiple symbols at the same time.

This also helps with more complicated strategies (multiple methods of entry/exit/stop) on a single symbol to see live which entry/exit/stop is being used and other stats about each entry/exit/stop in real time.

The following is only an example of a few datapoints that become very important in development and actual live trading:

1. Position status of each symbol, entry price, target, stop
2. Current profit/loss in real time for each symbol for open trades
3. Profit/Loss for the day for each symbol
4. Number of trades each symbol has done in last x hours, x days, x weeks
5. Percentage win for each symbol for the last x trades
6. Sharpe ratio for each symbol
7, 8, 9 ... Other risk metrics etc.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mucko] #463558
12/12/16 23:45
12/12/16 23:45
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Did you read the section about Strategy Control Panels? Isn't this what you are looking for?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #463566
12/13/16 19:06
12/13/16 19:06
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
M
Mucko Offline
Newbie
Mucko  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
I saw that - that appears to be a static panel derived from a .csv file with some additional control aspects. It appears to be only for static data (unless I am mistaken).

I am talking about the ability to push live data (last price, entry price, exit price, trail stop etc.) to a panel so one can easily view the data in real time.

Additionally populating historical data for each symbol/system which is live trading and/or currently turned off based upon rules.

As soon as strategies become more complex and run on multiple symbols or a large portfolio of symbols, creating switching rules, debugging and specific improvements become more difficult without seeing live data as the strategy calculates in real time. Odd things can occur which are undetectable in backtesting/optimizing against a portfolio but are clearly evident when watching in real time.

Perhaps adding the ability in Zorro to use a DDE link/server to export into excel would probably do the trick.

Last edited by Mucko; 12/13/16 19:15.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mucko] #463568
12/13/16 22:20
12/13/16 22:20
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Sphin Offline
User
Sphin  Offline
User

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 568
Fuerth, DE
Quote:
I am talking about the ability to push live data (last price, entry price, exit price, trail stop etc.) to a panel so one can easily view the data in real time.


From the manual:
Quote:
panelSet (int row, int col, string text, int color, int style, int type)
Set properties or update content of an individual cell.

With this command you can update the content of any cell of the panel with any live data at any time you like while the command 'panel' initiates a panel optional with loading its initial structure from a .csv.
I guess the question is more how useful is watching the 'live parameters' with your eyes instead of let them watch by a machine. A quick & dirty solution (I use them often, indeed) might be to save the parameters of your interest to a text file by Zorro (each minute or each intervall you like), set a DSN to it and use the DSN in Excel as the data source.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sphin] #463569
12/13/16 23:59
12/13/16 23:59
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
M
Mucko Offline
Newbie
Mucko  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
CA - California
Thanks - will give it a shot.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #463577
12/14/16 11:10
12/14/16 11:10
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 12
New South Wales
C
CaptainChezza Offline
Newbie
CaptainChezza  Offline
Newbie
C

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 12
New South Wales
Originally Posted By: boatman
+1 for FIX API


Curious, how does zorro connect to brokers at the moment, if not through the MT4 bridge? I thought zorro connected already via fix api?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: CaptainChezza] #463655
12/19/16 23:50
12/19/16 23:50
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1
London
C
cosmor Offline
Guest
cosmor  Offline
Guest
C

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1
London
Hi Z community,

I vote for Artificial assets as very high priority.

Meanwhile, it would be nice if any guru can give a script example, (based on current Zoro version) of e.g USDX (dollar index) to be calculated on the fly

( example of weighted formula from MQ4:

ExtMapBuffer1[i]=50.14348112*MathPow(iClose("EURUSD",0,i),-0.576)*MathPow(iClose("USDJPY",0,i),0.136)*MathPow(iClose("GBPUSD",0,i),-0.119)*MathPow(iClose("USDCAD",0,i),0.091)*MathPow(iClose("USDSEK",0,i),0.042)*MathPow(iClose("USDCHF",0,i),0.036);

)

and use some series transformation functions or an example of a peak/ valey or crossover example.

As this would be an artificial value on some brokers, there will be no bars or price series, but can be constructed on the fly.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: cosmor] #463752
12/24/16 04:42
12/24/16 04:42
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 23
NSW
M
mayark Offline
Newbie
mayark  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 23
NSW
The time stamp in message log should include the seconds of each bar creation, which currently shows only the hour and the minute.. Me thinks laugh.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #463755
12/24/16 09:20
12/24/16 09:20
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Better resume trading support. As far as I can see, Zorro still doesn't exactly pick up trading where it stopped. When I restart and I click result, the chart only shows 1 day of history and the portfolio.txt doesn't show the actual portfolio, even when the strategy ran for weeks. I don't know if this is fixed already, but in former Zorro versions restarting Zorro also messed with the Z12 portfolio. Just after restarting, like 20% - 30% of all open trades were closed almost immediately.

And I want to report a bug (didn't find a better place for this): I'm using Windows 10 on a Core2Duo Notebook (slightly above 2GHz). When I hit start in Zorro (I only tested this with Z12), Desktop Window Manager jumps from 8% CPU to 55% - 58%, causing the fan to run at all times.

Last edited by sdh309795gaas; 12/24/16 09:22.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: yosoytrader] #463756
12/24/16 09:40
12/24/16 09:40
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Support for economic indicators / news releases (For example Forexfactory calendar).

Relying 100% on technicals is like you are driving a car by only looking in the rear mirror!

http://topshelftraders.com/articles.php?id=335

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #464733
03/07/17 13:19
03/07/17 13:19
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 9
Frankfurt
M
mig Offline
Newbie
mig  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 9
Frankfurt
Hi,
Since the release of 1.54.1, you can trade index futures via the IB Bridge, too.
One important feature the IB Bridge is missing though, is the ability to get live traded volume data send when doing live trading via IB.
For example, this prevents the use of filters which depend on the total bar volume to either validate entry signals or to be used as early exit parameters if the volume falls under a certain threshold.
On intra-day strategies with a short BarPeriod such filters make a lot of sense on momentum or trend strategies to limit the amount of “false signals”….

So pls vote for this enhancement of the IB Bridge in the next release.

Thanks

Re: Votes for future features [Re: mig] #464734
03/07/17 13:45
03/07/17 13:45
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
S
smn Offline
Newbie
smn  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
Fully agree! That would indeed be great to have.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: smn] #465130
04/03/17 22:23
04/03/17 22:23
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
D
DeusExMachina Offline
Newbie
DeusExMachina  Offline
Newbie
D

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
As a cTrader User, I would love to see native cTrader (a.k.a. FIX) support.
Spowtware seems to have started something about a year ago: https://github.com/spotware/connect-zorro-plugin

Re: Votes for future features [Re: mig] #465134
04/04/17 09:50
04/04/17 09:50
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
B
boatman Offline OP
Senior Member
boatman  Offline OP
Senior Member
B

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted By: mig
Hi,
Since the release of 1.54.1, you can trade index futures via the IB Bridge, too.
One important feature the IB Bridge is missing though, is the ability to get live traded volume data send when doing live trading via IB.
For example, this prevents the use of filters which depend on the total bar volume to either validate entry signals or to be used as early exit parameters if the volume falls under a certain threshold.
On intra-day strategies with a short BarPeriod such filters make a lot of sense on momentum or trend strategies to limit the amount of “false signals”….

So pls vote for this enhancement of the IB Bridge in the next release.

Thanks


I vote for this feature too. It is one that I would consider critical for futures trading.
Thanks!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #465434
04/27/17 12:17
04/27/17 12:17
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Live volume was implemented some time ago, and historical volume theoretically also, but the latter does not work yet for all assets.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #465469
04/29/17 14:12
04/29/17 14:12
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
A dynamic plotting function. In MT4, I can zoom and move graphs in backtests, I can see Entries, Exits, StopLosses and most importantly: Plot the indicators that generate a trading signal next to the simulated trades. This would help me while debugging.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #465477
04/30/17 05:35
04/30/17 05:35
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
+1 for dynamic plotting.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #465480
04/30/17 10:22
04/30/17 10:22
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 35
therealLeon Offline
Newbie
therealLeon  Offline
Newbie

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 35
+1 for dynamic plotting - also from me

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #465535
05/02/17 17:44
05/02/17 17:44
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland

Nobody up to Python Bridge? As more I learn about machine learning as more I encounter python more suited for advance models

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #465537
05/02/17 18:12
05/02/17 18:12
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Would be surprised if there is something you can do in Python that you cannot do in R?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #465589
05/05/17 00:11
05/05/17 00:11
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
Thats probably true.... I just see more examples around of python machine learning libraries than with the R ones.

Last edited by Nanitek; 05/05/17 00:11.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #465695
05/09/17 21:16
05/09/17 21:16
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 65
G
Ger1 Offline
Junior Member
Ger1  Offline
Junior Member
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 65
+1 dynamic plotting too

implementation of the Leverage-Space-Model

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Ger1] #465737
05/10/17 20:38
05/10/17 20:38
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 48
Bologna
K
kmerlo Offline
Newbie
kmerlo  Offline
Newbie
K

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 48
Bologna
+1 dynamic plotting too

Re: Votes for future features [Re: kmerlo] #465756
05/11/17 08:07
05/11/17 08:07
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Looks like a lot interest for dynamic plotting.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #465830
05/14/17 16:06
05/14/17 16:06
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Since we have MAE already, a function for Maximum Favorable Excursion would be nice :-)

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #465953
05/18/17 15:58
05/18/17 15:58
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 26
London - Prague - Kho Yao Noi
S
Sinuhet Offline
Newbie
Sinuhet  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 26
London - Prague - Kho Yao Noi
+1 dynamic plotting too

It would be great to use the functionality of STEPWISE for "visual debugging" for both trades and indicators.
The user could define for such "Market Replay" both:
1. step ("bar by bar" or "trade by trade")
2. speed of replay.

There are not many platforms with the Playback functionality and each of them address it in a slightly different way. So it may be worth checking first:
1. Multicharts: https://www.multicharts.com/features/data-playback/
2. NinjaTrader: https://ninjatrader.com/support/helpGuides/nt8/en-us/?playback.htm
3. Sierra Charts: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/ReplayChart.html

Last edited by Sinuhet; 05/18/17 16:01.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Sinuhet] #466081
05/24/17 10:47
05/24/17 10:47
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
GreenBoat Offline
Junior Member
GreenBoat  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
I would like Zorro to safe the Strategy Script directory. I don't use the default directory and every time I start Zorro, I have to change the directory.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: GreenBoat] #466082
05/24/17 11:15
05/24/17 11:15
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
M
MatPed Offline
User
MatPed  Offline
User
M

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
+1 on Safe Script Directory

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #466418
06/13/17 12:04
06/13/17 12:04
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
S
smn Offline
Newbie
smn  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
A Python3 bridge would be awesome as Python is my weapon of choice now. And I am absolutely sure I am not alone with this. Please support my vote if you agree!

Last edited by smn; 06/13/17 12:07.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: smn] #466472
06/16/17 00:14
06/16/17 00:14
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
Originally Posted By: smn
A Python3 bridge would be awesome as Python is my weapon of choice now. And I am absolutely sure I am not alone with this. Please support my vote if you agree!


I agree with it. You maybe can do everything as well with R, but you may need to reinvent the wheel for that

Re: Votes for future features [Re: smn] #466495
06/17/17 16:34
06/17/17 16:34
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
pcz Offline
Member
pcz  Offline
Member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 180
Prague
Agree - I've always loved R and the R bridge was one of the reasons I bought Zorro but I switched to Python as it's better suited for many things I need.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #466526
06/19/17 14:24
06/19/17 14:24
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
S
smn Offline
Newbie
smn  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
Pythonic is easier and there is not much if anything Python cannot do but R can do. Even academia uses Python more now than R. Just check out google search term trends......

Re: Votes for future features [Re: smn] #466538
06/20/17 06:03
06/20/17 06:03
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
B
boatman Offline OP
Senior Member
boatman  Offline OP
Senior Member
B

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 482
Sydney, Australia
While I am a big fan of R, I find myself also doing more in Python and less in R as time goes by.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: yosoytrader] #466547
06/20/17 12:58
06/20/17 12:58
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
capability to Zorro for downloading data from https://stooq.com/

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #466548
06/20/17 14:11
06/20/17 14:11
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
GreenBoat Offline
Junior Member
GreenBoat  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
Originally Posted By: stephane97490
capability to Zorro for downloading data from https://stooq.com/

Another data source would be nice, so definitely +1.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: GreenBoat] #466551
06/20/17 17:27
06/20/17 17:27
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
stooq is awesome

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #466553
06/20/17 18:09
06/20/17 18:09
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I've just looked into it and Stooq makes indeed a good impression.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #466554
06/20/17 18:26
06/20/17 18:26
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
I hope you will write a script to download stooq data or include it in zorro later.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #466556
06/20/17 19:55
06/20/17 19:55
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Sorry for OT, but when I go to stooq, everything is in polish. Can I change the language?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #466557
06/20/17 20:16
06/20/17 20:16
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
yes, you can change the language into english, juste look on your screen. try this page https://stooq.com/q/d/?s=eurusd

and Ctrl+F english

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #467150
07/18/17 09:45
07/18/17 09:45
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
One more thing I'd really like is to be able to produce more than one plot at a time. I often find myself running the same backtest multiple times just to produce different plots, like MAE, seasonal plots, price profiles etc which is really time consuming.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #467151
07/18/17 10:04
07/18/17 10:04
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 48
Bologna
K
kmerlo Offline
Newbie
kmerlo  Offline
Newbie
K

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 48
Bologna
It would be handy to be able to expand the main window
In fact, when the name script's is too long, it is cut in the menulist "script" and it is impossible to read all the name.
It is a problem if you're usually renamed different versions of the script with the suffix V1,V2 , etc...
For example I have "Trend Trading with ADX_V1.c" and "Trend Trading with ADX_V2.c" and the two script are indistinguishable

Thanks

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #467187
07/19/17 19:12
07/19/17 19:12
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
You'd like to run backtest and at the same time have multiple plots ?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #467188
07/19/17 19:22
07/19/17 19:22
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Yes, and by that I mean many main plots, not one main and several smaller underneath.
As an example, if I plot MAE and price profile during the same run, they are both plotted on top of each other.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: kmerlo] #467204
07/20/17 17:52
07/20/17 17:52
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
GreenBoat Offline
Junior Member
GreenBoat  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
Originally Posted By: kmerlo
It would be handy to be able to expand the main window
In fact, when the name script's is too long, it is cut in the menulist "script" and it is impossible to read all the name.
It is a problem if you're usually renamed different versions of the script with the suffix V1,V2 , etc...
For example I have "Trend Trading with ADX_V1.c" and "Trend Trading with ADX_V2.c" and the two script are indistinguishable

Thanks

+1

Re: Votes for future features [Re: GreenBoat] #467206
07/20/17 19:19
07/20/17 19:19
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
M
MatPed Offline
User
MatPed  Offline
User
M

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
Hi,
in the test result page, I'd like to have a statistic showing the correlation between the the different equity lines produced by the Strategies/Algo.

Thank you

Re: Votes for future features [Re: MatPed] #467436
08/02/17 11:58
08/02/17 11:58
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
B
Brax Offline
Member
Brax  Offline
Member
B

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
Hi,

I am rather new to Zorro, and i am really impressed with the power and speed of the platform. But i miss some sort of graphical interface, something similar to Amibroker where i can easily plot a chart for any asset, zoom it, see my trade signals, etc.

A lot of times is easier to find out a strategy when you can view it directly on a chart and play with it.

¿Any plans for achieving a more integrated user interface?

Thanks.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Brax] #467448
08/03/17 09:01
08/03/17 09:01
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Replacing the static chart with an interactive chart was already voted for by many users. It's on our list, although not for the immediate future.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #467455
08/03/17 11:16
08/03/17 11:16
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
B
Brax Offline
Member
Brax  Offline
Member
B

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
ok, i understand.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: kmerlo] #467556
08/12/17 10:23
08/12/17 10:23
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
J
johnnyp Offline
Newbie
johnnyp  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
+1 for expanding the main window, not least because the window is too narrow to allow me to read any longish error message.

How about the addition of a Compile button. Or an option to auto-compile on save. Here's why... I have had a few WTF moments when experimenting with sliders. I code my slider, save the script, go to Zorro's launcher, and the sliders have the default names. It took me a while to figure out that I need to compile the script in order for the slider names to change, and then it took me a while longer to figure out how to compile the script. So now I click on Test, then Stop, then I set the sliders as I need them, and finally I click on Test again and wonder how the process could be made easier.

Another gripe I have is that when I click on Results, the script editor window gets unmaximised every time.

All that being said, I'm still way more productive with Zorro than with MetaTrader.

Thanks!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: johnnyp] #467560
08/12/17 14:41
08/12/17 14:41
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland

- Python bridge

- +2 for expanding window

- Zorro for Ubuntu Linux

- Plot the plots included on profile.c at the end of a backtest for each asset-algo combination

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #467595
08/15/17 17:31
08/15/17 17:31
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
S
stephane97490 Offline
Newbie
stephane97490  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 30
france
zorro in ubuntu, it's like a dream

Re: Votes for future features [Re: stephane97490] #467655
08/19/17 08:31
08/19/17 08:31
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 23
A
atr Offline
Newbie
atr  Offline
Newbie
A

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 23
Please. I think it would be a good idea to allow people to read T1 data using the free Zorro version. Thanks.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: atr] #467699
08/23/17 11:53
08/23/17 11:53
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
AndrewAMD Online
Serious User
AndrewAMD  Online
Serious User

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
For those impatiently waiting for a dynamic charts capability, I should note that there is an R package designed exactly to do that: dygraphs for R .

You can zoom in and out. It has OHLC candlesticks. Using the Synchronization feature, you can plot an indicator/filter directly beneath. The list goes on.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: AndrewAMD] #467709
08/24/17 07:13
08/24/17 07:13
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
If possible I'd want to calculate Optimal F factors for each period when using WFO, rather than from the whole backtest

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #467752
08/27/17 09:59
08/27/17 09:59
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 7
S
sqirtle Offline
Newbie
sqirtle  Offline
Newbie
S

Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 7
+1 for:
Interactive chart window
Notepad++ integration with auto-compilation and help lookup.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: sqirtle] #467763
08/28/17 10:22
08/28/17 10:22
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
NumSampleWFO option.

Currently there is a NumSampleCycles which reshapes the price curve and allows to see how the strategy perform in different conditions ( then if the PF is similar between the cycles, then it still has an edge ).

The strategies are built using a WFO fix window. It means that eventhough this is OOS, in reallty the oos periods are completly biased. If the strategy could be tested over different wfo cyles, then we would really know how it really behaves. Then for exmaple, something like NumMaxWfo=10; and NumCyclesWfo = 5; would do 5 backtest of the strategy with wfo as 10,9,8,7,6 each.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #467773
08/29/17 16:33
08/29/17 16:33
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I believe you can do that already. Use NumTotalCycles, and change NumWFOCycles at any cycle. I haven't used this for WFO cycles yet, but in theory it should work.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #467779
08/30/17 20:18
08/30/17 20:18
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
You get error032. Not sure how to go around it.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: sqirtle] #467812
09/02/17 09:12
09/02/17 09:12
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
J
johnnyp Offline
Newbie
johnnyp  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
+1 for python bridge because I am much more familiar with pandas, sklearn, etc. than I am with the equivalent methods in R.

I would also like advise(NEURAL) to accept way more than 20 signal values. I know that I risk overfitting when using huge numbers of features, but I do need to export the features in order to run feature selection algorithms on them.

+1 also for Notepad++ integration with auto-compilation.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: johnnyp] #467847
09/04/17 13:47
09/04/17 13:47
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Error 032 means that the number of WFO or sample cycles changed not from cycle to cycle, but inside a cycle. The number must remain constant after the INITRUN. If you can't fix it, post the code in another thread on the forum and I'll check it.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #467868
09/05/17 00:12
09/05/17 00:12
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 58
P
pascalx Offline
Junior Member
pascalx  Offline
Junior Member
P

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 58
Minor: This setting reads like it can be automated. If two Zorro instances run strategies for the same API, then it could simply auto enable it, otherwise turn it off. Thus the user would not have to worry.

http://zorro-trader.com/manual/en/mode.htm
Quote:
NOLOCK
Don't synchronize multiple trading Zorro instances. Synchronization prevents simultaneous API access, but freezes all Zorros while a single Zorro waits for a response from the API. Set this flag for speeding up API access when the trading Zorros don't share the same API.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: sqirtle] #467898
09/06/17 15:55
09/06/17 15:55
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
GreenBoat Offline
Junior Member
GreenBoat  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
+1 for Notepad++ integration with auto-compilation and help lookup.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: GreenBoat] #468213
09/25/17 12:58
09/25/17 12:58
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
I think it would be nice with a mode flag that would enable brute force optimization, which is useful when data mining. I know it's possible to do this now as well, but it´s VERY easy to make a mistake when you have many parameters to optimize. Already with three parameters you get something like this

Code:
int ZPeriods[8] = {20, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, 500};
var EntryThresholds[5] = {0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2};
var ExitThresholds[4] = {0.5, 1, 1.5, 2};
	
int Index = optimize(1, 1, 8*5*4, 1)-1;
int Period = ZPeriods[Index%8];
var EntryThreshold =  EntryThresholds[(Index/8)%5];
var ExitThreshold = EntryThreshold*(1 - ExitThresholds[(Index/(8*5))%4]);


Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #468216
09/25/17 18:22
09/25/17 18:22
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
Originally Posted By: Dalla
I think it would be nice with a mode flag that would enable brute force optimization, which is useful when data mining. .....

+1

It is good to get more samples for white really check

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #468218
09/25/17 23:48
09/25/17 23:48
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
H
Hredot Offline
Member
Hredot  Offline
Member
H

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
I vote +1 for interactive display charts with zoom option!

The strategies we write are only as good as our understanding of market behavior. Ease of investigation is the foremost driver of success!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Hredot] #468242
09/26/17 22:00
09/26/17 22:00
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 24
sodiumchloride Offline
Newbie
sodiumchloride  Offline
Newbie

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 24
Originally Posted By: Hredot
I vote +1 for interactive display charts with zoom option!

The strategies we write are only as good as our understanding of market behavior. Ease of investigation is the foremost driver of success!

+++

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #468278
09/27/17 23:15
09/27/17 23:15
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline
User
Zheka  Offline
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
+1 for OptimalF factors for each WFO period...And make the function itself customizable by the user!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Zheka] #468279
09/27/17 23:16
09/27/17 23:16
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline
User
Zheka  Offline
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
+1 for "Simultaneous connection to two brokers, or to a broker and a price source (Zorro S)"

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Zheka] #468297
09/28/17 12:31
09/28/17 12:31
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
B
Brax Offline
Member
Brax  Offline
Member
B

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
Originally Posted By: Zheka
+1 for OptimalF factors for each WFO period...And make the function itself customizable by the user!


+++

We should be able to retrieve and apply OptimalF factors on the go with each bar, just as you do with any other indicator. Now you only get the factor of the final bar, you can´t do any kind of OptimalF backtesting.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Brax] #468309
09/28/17 16:14
09/28/17 16:14
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
One suggestion:
Maybe the function verify could just be var probability = verify();. Because the dbl file should be the default name of the strategy and the depth and long of the drawndown can be calculate from Equity

Last edited by Nanitek; 09/28/17 16:15.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #468446
10/04/17 17:07
10/04/17 17:07
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
T
TipmyPip Offline
Junior Member
TipmyPip  Offline
Junior Member
T

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
Suggestion for Multi time frame.

that will enable experts to be programmed with any combination of data feed from two different time frames, or three or even more, and enable multi currency expert trading.

And enable compiling of code for stand alone application which will give even higher performance to work with, like an IDE compiler.

Last edited by TipmyPip; 10/04/17 17:09.

ZorroTraderGPT - https://bit.ly/3Gbsm4S
Re: Votes for future features [Re: TipmyPip] #468458
10/05/17 10:13
10/05/17 10:13
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I suppose that's one of the rare examples of wishes fulfilled before they even came up.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #468470
10/06/17 06:04
10/06/17 06:04
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1
København
A
Aleksanderthor Offline
Guest
Aleksanderthor  Offline
Guest
A

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1
København
+1 for python bridge

Re: Votes for future features [Re: yosoytrader] #468479
10/06/17 14:15
10/06/17 14:15
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
+1 artificial assets from a linear combination of real asset for basket trading
+1 interactive chart window

Re: Votes for future features [Re: hatten] #468602
10/11/17 15:47
10/11/17 15:47
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
D
dr_panther Offline
Junior Member
dr_panther  Offline
Junior Member
D

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
+1 for python bridge

Re: Votes for future features [Re: dr_panther] #468956
10/29/17 18:20
10/29/17 18:20
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
I'm thinking this program is something that Zorro would qualify for, given the integration to IB for example.

CME Non-Professional Globex Data Package
http://www.iqfeed.net/index.cfm?displayaction=data&section=feewaiver

Would be great to be able to get a feed from IQFeed at a discount :-)

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #469101
11/05/17 13:09
11/05/17 13:09
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
J
johnnyp Offline
Newbie
johnnyp  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
Quote:
Error 111: Crash in script: myfunc()

If myfunc() is called 100 times per tick from multiple different places, then this error message is totally useless to me. Besides according to the manual various different errors could cause an Error 111.
Quote:
A function in the script crashed due to a wrong operation, such as a division by zero, a wrong array index, or exceeding the stack size by declaring huge local arrays.

Can Zorro not be a little more specific as to the cause of the error?

Could Zorro not provide a call trace? Just knowing which line of code called the function that crashed would be nice. Knowing the function call hierarchy up to the most recent run() or tick() call would be even better.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: johnnyp] #469102
11/05/17 13:54
11/05/17 13:54
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Check this page: http://zorro-trader.com/manual/en/trouble.htm
Specifically check the pos function, which seems to address your concern. (Also note that pos function is new in the v1.70, currently in beta)

Re: Votes for future features [Re: johnnyp] #469107
11/05/17 15:22
11/05/17 15:22
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 58
P
pascalx Offline
Junior Member
pascalx  Offline
Junior Member
P

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 58
Originally Posted By: johnnyp
Can Zorro not be a little more specific as to the cause of the error?

Could Zorro not provide a call trace? Just knowing which line of code called the function that crashed would be nice. Knowing the function call hierarchy up to the most recent run() or tick() call would be even better.


Imo if you want better code and debugging then you should consider DLL strategies. See http://www.zorro-trader.com/manual/en/dlls.htm

Zorro comes bundled with the DLL API. It's easier to use than Lite-C.

For a better c++ API you can clone https://github.com/xezon/zorro-dll (was made for ZorroBeta_1.70.7 as proof of concept).

Feedback on above implementation would be much appreciated.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: pascalx] #469234
11/09/17 11:04
11/09/17 11:04
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
M
MatPed Offline
User
MatPed  Offline
User
M

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
Hi,
it would be nice to have the same title of the Zorro's window displayed in the Trading status bar. At this time the version and the name of the account is missing.

Thank You

Re: Votes for future features [Re: pascalx] #469250
11/09/17 18:04
11/09/17 18:04
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
J
johnnyp Offline
Newbie
johnnyp  Offline
Newbie
J

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 40
Unfortunately, I have no experience coding in C or C++. I am much more used to the ease of more modern programming languages that tend to have much more informative stack traces.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: johnnyp] #469324
11/10/17 22:01
11/10/17 22:01
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
WA
Y
Yosh Offline
Newbie
Yosh  Offline
Newbie
Y

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
WA
1. Nadex API Plugin
2. Cantor Exchange API Plugin

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Yosh] #469478
11/17/17 14:10
11/17/17 14:10
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 34
C
Cheulmen Offline
Newbie
Cheulmen  Offline
Newbie
C

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 34
Here goes my vote for next releases:

1.- Python bridge
2.- Advise() method for training and executing a TensorFlow graph.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Cheulmen] #469725
12/04/17 21:38
12/04/17 21:38
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
i know it has nothing to do with Zorro itself, but can you tell me why the manual never opens with the "Site map" if you folow a specific link? Thats very annoying frown

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #469879
12/12/17 12:54
12/12/17 12:54
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
better GUI (dropdown, dynamic content, ...)

News indicator (historical for backtest + live) from any of the websites providing all kind of FX news.

generic optimization

rework profile.c - poor performance

allow negative values for optimization e.g. range from -10 to 10, step: 2 - at least this gives me an error atm smirk

non-linear options for Data slope





Last edited by easyX; 12/14/17 11:55.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #469968
12/16/17 22:46
12/16/17 22:46
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
D
DdlV Offline
Serious User
DdlV  Offline
Serious User
D

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
Hi easyX. For

allow negative values for optimization e.g. range from -10 to 10, step: 2 - at least this gives me an error atm

use 0 to 20 in the optimize and subtract 10 outside.

HTH.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #470020
12/19/17 16:16
12/19/17 16:16
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
O
oligodar Offline
Newbie
oligodar  Offline
Newbie
O

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
I vote for "Interactive chart window."

Thank you

Re: Votes for future features [Re: dr_panther] #470274
01/06/18 09:03
01/06/18 09:03
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
I find the use of a panel very helpful. Once you start using a panel, the desire arises to be able to create more than one. So I vote for enhanced panel functionality enabling the use of more than a single panel.

Artificial assets from a linear combination of real asset for basket trading has been on the todo list for a long time. For what version is its implementation planned?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: dr_panther] #470295
01/07/18 16:08
01/07/18 16:08
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Germany
P
piper Offline
Guest
piper  Offline
Guest
P

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Germany
+1 for Python bridge
+1 support for configurable neural nets via TensorFlow
+1 interactive dynamic chart window

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #470393
01/11/18 13:43
01/11/18 13:43
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
GreenBoat Offline
Junior Member
GreenBoat  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 66
Add Name as one more parameter to the function Optimize, so it would be possible to create your own parameter name for the WFO Zorro Report.

The report would be more intelligible and easier to understand at the first sight.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #470514
01/17/18 22:22
01/17/18 22:22
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
WA
Y
Yosh Offline
Newbie
Yosh  Offline
Newbie
Y

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 6
WA
MT4 to Oanda API bridge so we can trade EA's. I can't find a good solution for this that doesn't cost $1k. HELP!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Yosh] #470548
01/19/18 21:21
01/19/18 21:21
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1
Italy, Bologna
C
Coso_Antonio Offline
Guest
Coso_Antonio  Offline
Guest
C

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1
Italy, Bologna
1) Interactive chart window.

2) Python bridge.

3) Artificial assets from a linear combination of real assets, for basket trading or multi-asset arbitrage.


Last edited by Coso_Antonio; 01/19/18 21:25.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Coso_Antonio] #470647
01/28/18 05:36
01/28/18 05:36
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
H
Hredot Offline
Member
Hredot  Offline
Member
H

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
Any chance of seeing a numerical erf(x) function in Zorro some time soon?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_function

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Hredot] #470651
01/28/18 18:51
01/28/18 18:51
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 586
Austria
Petra Offline
Support
Petra  Offline
Support

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 586
Austria
var erf(var x) { return 2*cdf(x*1.414)-1.; }

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Petra] #470652
01/28/18 22:30
01/28/18 22:30
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
H
Hredot Offline
Member
Hredot  Offline
Member
H

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 235
Perfect! Overlooked that one, thank you Petra.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Hredot] #470667
01/29/18 12:02
01/29/18 12:02
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
D
dr_panther Offline
Junior Member
dr_panther  Offline
Junior Member
D

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
+1 for Python bridge

Re: Votes for future features [Re: dr_panther] #470674
01/29/18 22:05
01/29/18 22:05
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 56
I
ibne Offline
Junior Member
ibne  Offline
Junior Member
I

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 56
+1 Python bridge

Re: Votes for future features [Re: ibne] #470882
02/10/18 17:57
02/10/18 17:57
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
Python bridge is already in the scope
http://manual.zorro-project.com/new.htm

+ 1 for linux

that would allow the use of gpu deeplearning ami from amazon. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B06VSPXKDX

Re: Votes for future features [Re: yosoytrader] #470980
02/15/18 11:07
02/15/18 11:07
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
High on my wish list is a zorro connection for the DeGiro.

DeGiro has for the european stock and ETF market better conditions than IB.
The main issue with trading the US market is the exchange rate risk which is currently indeed, at least temporarily, chewing up any income you generate with Z9 or other conservative strategies one may run. Therefore the addition of a DeGiro API would be excellent to the tap european market and benefit from the lower costs. THis seems feasible:
https://github.com/pladaria/degiro

Re: Votes for future features [Re: hatten] #471225
02/23/18 22:32
02/23/18 22:32
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
H
hpsilva Offline
Guest
hpsilva  Offline
Guest
H

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
I know python bridge is already in the plan.

However i would add here my +1 vote for it.

Python bridge pretty please!!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: hpsilva] #471380
03/01/18 19:20
03/01/18 19:20
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
is it somehow possible to get an offset by seconds? So that e.g 1 min bars are shifted just by 1-2 seconds?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #471525
03/07/18 14:53
03/07/18 14:53
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
T
Tucker Offline
Guest
Tucker  Offline
Guest
T

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
+1 python bridge!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Tucker] #471551
03/09/18 10:24
03/09/18 10:24
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 93
Düsseldorf, Germany
M
mhdus Offline
Junior Member
mhdus  Offline
Junior Member
M

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 93
Düsseldorf, Germany
+1 for "Artificial assets from a linear combination of real assets, for basket trading or multi-asset arbitrage." - very important for option strategies in particular

Re: Votes for future features [Re: mhdus] #471651
03/12/18 15:31
03/12/18 15:31
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
Taking into account the TimeZone for dataParse would be great. So that it would be easy to read CET based history data (including DST).

Also consindering DST before the year 2000 would be nice (1996 there was a change in germany).

An automatic time adjustment of any data history based on NFP news (always at 8:30 EST) would be the very best option. Data with inconsistency could be fixed.

Last edited by easyX; 03/12/18 15:33.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #471783
03/19/18 18:10
03/19/18 18:10
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
O
oligodar Offline
Newbie
oligodar  Offline
Newbie
O

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
+1 python bridge!

Re: Votes for future features [Re: oligodar] #472078
04/05/18 14:14
04/05/18 14:14
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland
N
nanotir Offline
Senior Member
nanotir  Offline
Senior Member
N

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 336
Rogaland

Use NumCores for testing too

Re: Votes for future features [Re: nanotir] #472108
04/08/18 17:37
04/08/18 17:37
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
M
MatPed Offline
User
MatPed  Offline
User
M

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 652
Milano, Italy
I'd like a new indicator: Super bandpass filter by John Ehlers. Thx

Re: Votes for future features [Re: MatPed] #472170
04/13/18 19:09
04/13/18 19:09
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Hi

VWAP and TWAP as indicators with a possibility of fixing the anchor (monthly, quarterly, daily, annualy) would be a great addition to the indicator list.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: hatten] #472397
04/25/18 10:26
04/25/18 10:26
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Hi,

Interactive chart windows is already long on our Christmas list for Zorro.
I would like to draw the op group to the possibility of using the free charting library of tradingview which has an API to use ones "own" (i.e. zorro's) data.
https://de.tradingview.com/HTML5-stock-forex-bitcoin-charting-library/
Integration with zorro would greatly enhance our trading system
developement and mining experience.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: hatten] #472474
04/29/18 21:26
04/29/18 21:26
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
Please add multi core for standard optimizing (non-WFO).

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #472778
05/22/18 17:30
05/22/18 17:30
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
E
easyX Offline
Newbie
easyX  Offline
Newbie
E

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Germany
A function returning the number of trading days between 2 DATE's would be nice. Or is there an easy way to do this i missed?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: easyX] #473478
07/12/18 09:52
07/12/18 09:52
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
B
Brax Offline
Member
Brax  Offline
Member
B

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
- Some sort of interactive chart window
- Being able to download previous versions of Zorro
- Specify a different location for History folder in Setup, add a new HistoryFolder variable.

Last edited by brax; 07/12/18 09:53.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: oligodar] #473634
07/30/18 13:52
07/30/18 13:52
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1
A
Apfelbaum Offline
Guest
Apfelbaum  Offline
Guest
A

Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1
+1 Degiro API

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #473756
08/09/18 23:12
08/09/18 23:12
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
O
OptimusPrime Offline
Junior Member
OptimusPrime  Offline
Junior Member
O

Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
Hi Team:
Thanks for this wonderful application and your efforts.

1) Could we have an overlay application for generating the basic script template? The user would simply click on a number of checkboxes that fit their intended script and then the overlay app would generate the basic script in Notepad.

Last edited by OptimusPrime; 08/09/18 23:50.

Thanks so much,

OptimusPrime

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #473759
08/10/18 18:51
08/10/18 18:51
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
O
OptimusPrime Offline
Junior Member
OptimusPrime  Offline
Junior Member
O

Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
Hi Team:

Can we expand the genetic programming capability by expanding the decision tree feature to incorporate operators such a multiplication, division, etc?

There is a trading program I used in the past that uses the RSI, CCI, Max, Min, Modulus, Comparison (><=), Stochastics, Moving Average, OHLC, and a similiar set of features to auto-generate the decision-tree Trading Rules. It creates a population of artificial traders, each with unique computer-generated trading rules for Long, Short, and Exits.and maintains them in an auction system to model real world market participants. Parameters are automatically selected by the genetic algorithm as it creates the tree.

Zorro's DTREE outputs looks just like it, except it is not automatically utilizing indicator sets and mathematical operators. Or, I am not familiar enough with Zorro to see that we can do the same thing here.

My wish is to expand Zorro's current DTREE feature to also incorporate more mathematical operators and a set of indicators (Fisher, MA, Stochastics, CCI, etc..) to create trading decision tree rules.

Last edited by OptimusPrime; 08/10/18 18:55.

Thanks so much,

OptimusPrime

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #473780
08/14/18 05:18
08/14/18 05:18
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
O
OptimusPrime Offline
Junior Member
OptimusPrime  Offline
Junior Member
O

Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
Hi Team:

For your consideration:

I believe the Manual is using the term "Signal" instead of the more accurate term "Input" in some spots. In both text and code, we refer to an indicator we just created as a "Signal" instead of just calling it an Indicator. At the same time, the manual also refers to the final trade decision as a "Trade Signal". This should be streamlined.

We use signal in both of these two senses in this statement from Workshop 5,

"For generating trade signals, it is normalized and Fisher transformed, and the resulting Signal series is finally compared with an upper and lower Threshold for generating trade signals."

Can we reserve "Signal" for the context of a Trade Signal.. ie. a Buy ,Sell, Exit, or Hold signal ? An indicator crossing a threshold is an event. It is that crossing event that we would call a signal. Ex, it is commonly stated that 'Neural Networks accept inputs in order to output trade signals'.

Likewise, it is easier to say that we feed inputs to adviseLong() or adviseShort() in order to generate a Buy or Sell "Signal".

Here are some restatements of parts of the Manual:

"To create our final indicator, it is normalized and Fisher transformed, and the resulting Indicator series is finally compared with an upper and lower Threshold for generating trade signals."

"In training mode, Zorro learns rules that predict the success of a trade from the Inputs". "Inputs should be normalized roughly to the 100.. -100 range. "

vars Fisher_BandPass_Indicator = series(FisherN(Filtered,500)); // instead of
//vars Signal =


Thanks so much,

OptimusPrime

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #474283
10/04/18 11:45
10/04/18 11:45
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 12
K
kreko Offline
Newbie
kreko  Offline
Newbie
K

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 12
Native support for Kraken crypto exchange

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #474321
10/06/18 09:26
10/06/18 09:26
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 4
VIC
D
djhenry1981 Offline
Guest
djhenry1981  Offline
Guest
D

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 4
VIC
I would love a Pepperstone API

Re: Votes for future features [Re: djhenry1981] #474326
10/06/18 13:16
10/06/18 13:16
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 106
3
3dgamelight Offline
Member
3dgamelight  Offline
Member
3

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 106
Quote:
[...]with a minimum of AUD $250m trading volume[...]

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #474392
10/11/18 10:33
10/11/18 10:33
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
H
hatten Offline
Junior Member
hatten  Offline
Junior Member
H

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Currently when switching between multiple brokers (as for instance in the broker arbitrage script) variables relevant for money management such as Balance, Equity, MarginVal etc. are not downloaded for the broker of the selected asset, but only for the initial broker selected in the zorro window. It would be a valauble addition to also updated these variables when switching to a symbol from a different broker using the asset command.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #474412
10/13/18 08:52
10/13/18 08:52
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
T
TipmyPip Offline
Junior Member
TipmyPip  Offline
Junior Member
T

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
Have Zorro Trader work with Mathematica, Matlab.


ZorroTraderGPT - https://bit.ly/3Gbsm4S
Re: Votes for future features [Re: TipmyPip] #474413
10/13/18 08:53
10/13/18 08:53
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
T
TipmyPip Offline
Junior Member
TipmyPip  Offline
Junior Member
T

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
Enable Zorro Trader to Compile Stand alone strategy executables with Visual Studio.

Last edited by TipmyPip; 10/13/18 08:55.

ZorroTraderGPT - https://bit.ly/3Gbsm4S
Re: Votes for future features [Re: TipmyPip] #474414
10/13/18 08:57
10/13/18 08:57
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
T
TipmyPip Offline
Junior Member
TipmyPip  Offline
Junior Member
T

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 81
Zorro Trader should also have an application like : www.strategyquant.com


ZorroTraderGPT - https://bit.ly/3Gbsm4S
Re: Votes for future features [Re: TipmyPip] #474466
10/17/18 15:50
10/17/18 15:50
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
PE
C
CAB Offline
Guest
CAB  Offline
Guest
C

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1
PE
Hi,

my suggestions is Zorro with real time chart..

Re: Votes for future features [Re: CAB] #474467
10/17/18 16:08
10/17/18 16:08
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
AndrewAMD Online
Serious User
AndrewAMD  Online
Serious User

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
Originally Posted By: CAB
Hi,

my suggestions is Zorro with real time chart..
This feature is available in the beta.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: AndrewAMD] #474484
10/19/18 03:43
10/19/18 03:43
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 27
M
Mio Offline
Newbie
Mio  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 27
Native support for bitMEX crypto futures exchange

Last edited by Mio; 10/19/18 03:43.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mio] #474489
10/19/18 12:06
10/19/18 12:06
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
AndrewAMD Online
Serious User
AndrewAMD  Online
Serious User

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
Originally Posted By: Mio
Native support for bitMEX crypto futures exchange
Sierra Chart supports BitMEX, so you can use the Sierra Chart plugin (now in beta, testers wanted).

Re: Votes for future features [Re: AndrewAMD] #474867
11/10/18 01:59
11/10/18 01:59
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 27
M
Mio Offline
Newbie
Mio  Offline
Newbie
M

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 27
I have 2 ideas.

1. We need a bug report system like github. Because it's inefficient with mail.
2. We need a public market to buy or sell strategy with members. And provide reliable backtrace and walkforward report.


Last edited by Mio; 11/10/18 02:00.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mio] #475689
01/03/19 16:59
01/03/19 16:59
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 56
I
ibne Offline
Junior Member
ibne  Offline
Junior Member
I

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 56
Python bridge +1

Working with Python(or Jupyter respectively) would be an immense dooropener.
Python has trillions of very sophisticated libraries for working with financial data.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Mio] #475732
01/05/19 16:37
01/05/19 16:37
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
B
Brax Offline
Member
Brax  Offline
Member
B

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 102
Spain
Originally Posted By: Mio
I have 2 ideas.

1. We need a bug report system like github. Because it's inefficient with mail.
2. We need a public market to buy or sell strategy with members. And provide reliable backtrace and walkforward report.


+1 to both ideas, especially to bug report system like github.

Ideally it would be awesome for Zorro to be open sourced, maybe not entirely but it definitely would be a deal-breaker and would expand Zorro market share a lot.

+1 to Python bridge too.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Brax] #475735
01/05/19 19:53
01/05/19 19:53
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
I agree with the bug reporting system, but I strongly disagree with the idea of a marketplace to buy or sell strategies. I can see loads of potential issues with such a market place, and I'm sure we get better value for OP groups time being put into developing the Zorro platform rather than administrating a market place.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #475739
01/06/19 07:28
01/06/19 07:28
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Someone mentioned adding a cross hair to the chart with details at that point. This is an example from Pro real time that does this using a "cursor details" window.


Last edited by Dalla; 01/06/19 07:28.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #475942
01/14/19 20:21
01/14/19 20:21
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
O
OptimusPrime Offline
Junior Member
OptimusPrime  Offline
Junior Member
O

Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
That was me, Dalla.. Thanks for the example. laugh


Thanks so much,

OptimusPrime

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #476235
02/06/19 15:27
02/06/19 15:27
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
Please add a metric for "Max %DD from the preceding equity peak".
%DD of total profit is nice, but it doesn't tell you what kind of DD you could expect in actual live trading.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #476376
02/21/19 15:10
02/21/19 15:10
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
O
OptimusPrime Offline
Junior Member
OptimusPrime  Offline
Junior Member
O

Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 98
*** Variant of the Switch Case *** Optimizing Order of Logic

Please add a feature to enclose lines or segments of code in "cases" such that Zorro tries re-ordering the designated lines of code during optimization and then tells me the optimal arrangement.

By manually re-arranging my logic, I can sometimes improve results. It would be nice if I could tag specific areas of code and ask Zorro to optimize the order of the logic for me.

Last edited by OptimusPrime; 02/21/19 15:11.

Thanks so much,

OptimusPrime

Re: Votes for future features [Re: OptimusPrime] #476438
02/26/19 08:34
02/26/19 08:34
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1
TX
B
brach Offline
Guest
brach  Offline
Guest
B

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1
TX
A python bridge would be very powerful. +1

Re: Votes for future features [Re: brach] #476440
02/26/19 12:02
02/26/19 12:02
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline
User
Zheka  Offline
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
+1 for a suggestion on how to optimally integrate Python scripts

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Zheka] #476465
03/03/19 03:52
03/03/19 03:52
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
7
7th_zorro Offline
Junior Member
7th_zorro  Offline
Junior Member
7

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
+1 for C# dll support (broker dll, strategy dll)
+1 for telegram api (https://core.telegram.org/)
+1 for ChartDirector (https://www.advsofteng.com/finance_demo.html)
+1 for Upbit api (https://sg.upbit.com/home)


Last edited by 7th_zorro; 03/03/19 07:20.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: 7th_zorro] #476467
03/03/19 16:30
03/03/19 16:30
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 93
Düsseldorf, Germany
M
mhdus Offline
Junior Member
mhdus  Offline
Junior Member
M

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 93
Düsseldorf, Germany
Add Tiingo as a data provider: https://api.tiingo.com/

Re: Votes for future features [Re: mhdus] #476625
03/16/19 10:02
03/16/19 10:02
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
If technically possible: 64bit support! If easier, drop 32bit support. Nobody is using 32bit OSes anymore.

Benefit: No more memory related error messages! No more restrictions on how many assets to use, how long to choose the simulation period or what timeframe to use.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #476626
03/16/19 11:01
03/16/19 11:01
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 106
3
3dgamelight Offline
Member
3dgamelight  Offline
Member
3

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 106
+1. But it could be a expensive feature. Also +1 to "Stopping and resuming sessions without interrupting trade statistics"

Last edited by 3dgamelight; 03/16/19 11:13.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #476627
03/16/19 12:26
03/16/19 12:26
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
7
7th_zorro Offline
Junior Member
7th_zorro  Offline
Junior Member
7

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
I think two version may be ok.
32bit and 64bit each.
Because 64bit zorro can not load 32bit dll(broker, strategy aleady developed).

Last edited by 7th_zorro; 03/16/19 12:36.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: 7th_zorro] #476628
03/16/19 13:57
03/16/19 13:57
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
D
Dalla Offline
Senior Member
Dalla  Offline
Senior Member
D

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 369
+1 for 64 bit support.
Linux support? :-)

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Dalla] #476639
03/18/19 07:30
03/18/19 07:30
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
A special 64 bit version for backtests is possible, but would then not support lite-C. lite-C is strictly 32 bit. You would need VC++ for scripts. If that is acceptable, I can put it on the list.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #476641
03/18/19 08:14
03/18/19 08:14
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
7
7th_zorro Offline
Junior Member
7th_zorro  Offline
Junior Member
7

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
I think VC++ may be ok. Thank you very much jcl.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #476643
03/18/19 12:56
03/18/19 12:56
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
AndrewAMD Online
Serious User
AndrewAMD  Online
Serious User

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,725
Chicago
Originally Posted By: jcl
A special 64 bit version for backtests is possible, but would then not support lite-C. lite-C is strictly 32 bit. You would need VC++ for scripts. If that is acceptable, I can put it on the list.
I would definitely use this feature! And I would gladly recompile my plugins in 64-bit.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: AndrewAMD] #476644
03/18/19 18:19
03/18/19 18:19
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 90
Germanien
ags Offline
Junior Member
ags  Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 90
Germanien
Hi jcl,

what about a vertical zoom possibility for the Chart Viewer?
For long x axis with major value variations in the y axis, the chart becomes flat when you zoom in.

Or do i missed a command to zoom vertically ?


Edit 20.03. I just had a prblem while plotting from the script with:
if(!Train) plotGraph("A1",1,ZL[1]*1.02,DOT+MAIN,RED);
Without this code all graphs are zoomed in the y axis perfectly. So forget my proposal...

Last edited by ags; 03/20/19 10:14. Reason: Trouble recognized.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: ags] #476651
03/19/19 17:44
03/19/19 17:44
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Regarding 64bit:

VC++ means that this will be Zorro-S exclusive (fair - well at least not unfair!), right? Would that break the syntax as well?

Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #476658
03/20/19 08:19
03/20/19 08:19
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Yes, you'll need Zorro S. The syntax is almost the same - details in the manual under "VC++".

- The vertical zoom is automatic so that all details are visible. If the curve gets flat, there's probably another curve with very different values in the same chart - that should better go in a new chart.

Re: Votes for future features [Re: jcl] #476672
03/21/19 16:28
03/21/19 16:28
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Smon Offline
Member
Smon  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 206
Germany
Well, that would put a lot of pressure on me to finally put all the pieces I developed over the last 2 years together and send my first strategy live... Zorro is awesome, I just hesitated to buy/rent the Zorro-S license because it has become very expensive over time. Too expensive if it's not already earning money. Just for you to consider, if it was cheaper, you would have turned me into a paying customer two years ago...!

Maybe a Zorro-S educational license without the ability to trade live...? I'd love to pay 10 EUR/month for this.

Last edited by sdh309795gaas; 03/22/19 05:12.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #476676
03/22/19 00:57
03/22/19 00:57
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
7
7th_zorro Offline
Junior Member
7th_zorro  Offline
Junior Member
7

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
I can accept there is some limitation number of assets during backtest.
But in live trading, no reason to do so.

Last edited by 7th_zorro; 03/22/19 00:57.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: Smon] #476781
03/31/19 20:41
03/31/19 20:41
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2
T
tovim0712 Offline
Guest
tovim0712  Offline
Guest
T

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2

Re: Votes for future features [Re: tovim0712] #477260
06/07/19 13:32
06/07/19 13:32
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 20
K
kankan Offline
Newbie
kankan  Offline
Newbie
K

Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 20
Just adding my vote for the 64-bit C++ version

Re: Votes for future features [Re: boatman] #477833
08/02/19 04:35
08/02/19 04:35
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
7
7th_zorro Offline
Junior Member
7th_zorro  Offline
Junior Member
7

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 93
1. Drag and Drop support.
When .c zorro script file dropped to zorro, Script combo box changed to appropriate folder and selected to dropped file.

2. Strategy folder selected from ini file.
When zorro excuted, initial strategy folder is selected from zorro.ini file.
Or like notepad++ workspace docking pane, folder navigation support.





Last edited by 7th_zorro; 08/02/19 04:41.
Re: Votes for future features [Re: kankan] #477862
08/06/19 09:57
08/06/19 09:57
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Johannesburg
S
Sabre Offline
Guest
Sabre  Offline
Guest
S

Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 2
Johannesburg
Originally Posted by kankan
Just adding my vote for the 64-bit C++ version


If this were implemented, would we then be able to use 64bit Python with Tensorflow?

Page 1 of 24 1 2 3 23 24

Moderated by  Petra 

Gamestudio download | chip programmers | Zorro platform | shop | Data Protection Policy

oP group Germany GmbH | Birkenstr. 25-27 | 63549 Ronneburg / Germany | info (at) opgroup.de

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1