Ah ok, then I guess I mixed up something.

Let's call the thing C-script does compile at startup.

I never said the indie brought them in much money at all, I'm not sure where you got that, and as far as getting a better workflow or more powerful Im just saying that unity indie vs lite-c is trading power for workflow, where everyone keeps acting like unity indie is the ultimate, and beats gstudio, really its just a trade.


EDIT:


where do you get that comparison at all,
unity indie == gs extra
unity pro == gs comm

is a wayyyy more accurate comparison.

Only if you solely base it on the render-to-texture feature. Unity has a lot more to offer over Gamestudio like the better physics engine, the terrain and vegetation system, unlimited multiplayer, c#/boo/unityscript,...

Or the position within their price range.

Unity Indie and GS Extra --
Both were each company's cheapest product.
Both became free, both citing their respective products contributing very little to their overall profits as the reason.

Jibb

what about plugins and expandablity?

You can use any .NET library with Unity. C/C++ plugins are for Pro only though.

The strong point of unity is the workflow that is profesionnal tools !

In world editor : import a model, assign textures (or load from directory) , choose shader , edit animations names and length for animated models :
All that in the world editor : Just big

-Want to edit terrain just do it right here in the same world editor !
-Want to edit physic properties , just do it in world editor also.

Caus all core have been written in modern interface graphics, it look clean and allow all sort of things like panels, drag and drop elements on others.

Unity's workflow blows GS's workflow, anytime, anywhere. From designer point of view, i dont think GS is an option when there is Unity free.

But you can't say same thing about lite-c. Maybe because i am very new to unity's scripting concept, but i'd prefer lite-c over unity's scripting choices. Lite-c Feels more free, i prototype faster(programming wise) in lite-c. Not talking about being corss platform, since more than two thirds of user postin itt are only hobby developers and dont have/wont have commercial concerns, and highly possible that anyone other than their family/frineds wont see what they made.

Even so, You did not get the point
Apparentely Unity3d has a lot of Pro users ( 1500 usd) while I dont think it is the case of 3dgs

sorry for reviving this topic but i was playing with unity and i realized that if 3dgs was to implement WED into GED, then it'd stand a real chance, the major drawback of this engine is the art pipeline [level design and such] most dont know this because most never have to complete a full level...

and i just opened GED today and first thing i tried to make a terrain and it said open terrain, instead of create new.... not that i cant do it or am lazy but that immediately showed me something.. oh well, i'll continue playing with it, hopefully it can give me a level design pipeline

[edit]
and another point, when i finished editing my terrain with painting and such, it becomes another pain to make it look the same from your script, once again, this isnt about my ability to do so, i just started GED, didnt care of it before, so am comparing to what i saw in unity

[edit]
video window problems, annoying [this isnt a multitext terrain popup] but its looking ok

[edit]
tried importing a model, it reset my terrain painting for some reason so am too bored to care

[edit]
tried deleting a texture, it deleted the terrain, oh well, now i know what to do so i click undo to bring my terrain back annnnd:
script error or something
error1105 or something
GED now needs to be closed [dude, wtf]

oh well, guess i'll have to try something else, on to blender
-mumbles-