Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
Data from CSV not parsed correctly
by EternallyCurious. 04/18/24 10:45
StartWeek not working as it should
by Zheka. 04/18/24 10:11
folder management functions
by VoroneTZ. 04/17/24 06:52
lookback setting performance issue
by 7th_zorro. 04/16/24 03:08
zorro 64bit command line support
by 7th_zorro. 04/15/24 09:36
Zorro FIX plugin - Experimental
by flink. 04/14/24 07:48
Zorro FIX plugin - Experimental
by flink. 04/14/24 07:46
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
The Bible Game
A psychological thriller game
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (AndrewAMD), 600 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
EternallyCurious, 11honza11, ccorrea, sakolin, rajesh7827
19046 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 14 of 15 1 2 12 13 14 15
Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: PHeMoX] #291870
09/28/09 16:39
09/28/09 16:39
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
T
Toast Offline OP
Serious User
Toast  Offline OP
Serious User
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
Originally Posted By: PHeMoX
Obviously the basketball example makes a good visual representation of that idea, but in a practical sense the ball is not really 'everywhere'. (It's perhaps also where a multi-dimensional idea conflicts with our every day practice of a single dimensional life (we can currently only go forward in time, in 3D).)

I actually meant just the part of really touching the basketball. Like for friction people have this image of a rough surface each object has which intersect each other and so on. While it's not such a big step I found people being surprised that things don't "touch" each other at all because their knowledge usually stops at a mechanical world view...

For their multidimensional existance of the ball I guess you're right and they did a bit too much here although the idea behind it imo gets expressed pretty welll... laugh

Enjoy your meal
Toast

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: Toast] #292047
09/29/09 21:02
09/29/09 21:02
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
Quote:
Like for friction people have this image of a rough surface each object has which intersect each other and so on. While it's not such a big step I found people being surprised that things don't "touch" each other at all because their knowledge usually stops at a mechanical world view...


If you think that because on an (sub)atomic level touching something involves positive and negative energy, that you're not really touching the ball, then you're wrong.

Touching something is synonymous to 'interacting' with something. That certainly is happening.

Touching something is usually evident by collision or friction related behavior, yet the workings of physics on a sub-atomic level turns out to work with or involve energy.

That shouldn't be too surprising actually. wink

Don't forget objects can't have friction by true intersection, as even the smallest mass simply will not allow this to happen.

As a result, it's a bit questionable whether it's valid to think of object collisions and the impacts involved as being a result of two not actually touching objects. There is clearly interaction going on.


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: PHeMoX] #292060
09/29/09 22:09
09/29/09 22:09
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
T
Toast Offline OP
Serious User
Toast  Offline OP
Serious User
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
Well ok - we now can discuss what "touching" can mean. I meant it in the standard everyday meaning i.e. to objects "touch" each other. In reality the nucleons won't do that though...

There of course is the interaction and what the movie imo does a good job on is to explain that the parts which actually make up the solid shape of the things we know actually won't touch (unless you really want them to but that goes beyond what a person's household should be able to give)... wink

Enjoy your meal
Toast

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: Toast] #292100
09/30/09 11:15
09/30/09 11:15
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
T
Toast Offline OP
Serious User
Toast  Offline OP
Serious User
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
When getting back on the topic about aliens / UFOs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2wauxK8RKA

Either real or the best fake I've ever seen...

Enjoy your meal
Toast

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: Toast] #292105
09/30/09 11:47
09/30/09 11:47
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
Originally Posted By: Toast
Well ok - we now can discuss what "touching" can mean. I meant it in the standard everyday meaning i.e. to objects "touch" each other. In reality the nucleons won't do that though...


The standard everyday meaning is based upon the perception of how two things come into contact and interact. Again it makes no sense to look upon this as two objects not actually touching each other, the interaction is there. It's just how it works on a sub-atomic level.


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: PHeMoX] #292108
09/30/09 12:22
09/30/09 12:22
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
T
Toast Offline OP
Serious User
Toast  Offline OP
Serious User
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
In a mechanical sense of looking at things things actually touch though - i.e. the distance of the objects' surfaces pretty much goes to zero. The delivered information which people usually don't realize (at least that's my experience) is that such a "touching" won't happen on a sub-atomic level but the interactions happen on a distance...

That's a huge conceptional difference imo - in the one case things interact in some "mechanical" way i.e. the actual masses interact while in the other case all the interaction isn't really done by the involved particles but rather some effects, fields and whatever else there gets "spawned" by the particles is responsible for the interactions. That's quite some leap forward for someone explaining everything with billiard... wink

Enjoy your meal
Toast

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: Toast] #292116
09/30/09 13:07
09/30/09 13:07
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,232
Australia
EvilSOB Offline
Expert
EvilSOB  Offline
Expert

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,232
Australia
IMHO, it a very well done fake.
Only fails at basically one point I can pick. Its impact with the water is wrong.
When the 'spaceship' dives into the water,
1> the splash 'shape' is wrong for something hitting the water that rapidly.
2> the sound of the splash is instant, no time delay as one would expect from an object 300-500 meters distant.
3> the splash sound is too 'soft', not the 'slap' sound of a solid object hitting water.

But it is certainly one of the better ones Ive seen.


"There is no fate but what WE make." - CEO Cyberdyne Systems Corp.
A8.30.5 Commercial
Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: EvilSOB] #292118
09/30/09 13:16
09/30/09 13:16
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,436
Germany, Luebeck
Xarthor Offline
Expert
Xarthor  Offline
Expert

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,436
Germany, Luebeck
@EvilSOB:
Wenn looking at it very slowly, you can see that its not the "big black thing" which hits the water, but something smaller.

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: Toast] #292119
09/30/09 13:28
09/30/09 13:28
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,710
MMike Offline
Serious User
MMike  Offline
Serious User

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,710
that UFo.. weird.

The Air force killing them ( makes sense)
then UFO, diving into water, but notice the ejecting capsule.
they are so fast, that our eyes can't event see clealry.
The guys emotion and speech is very realistic, i would say there is something there.

And then the Heli saying them to leave..

Re: "Alien" caught in trap - now examined [Re: MMike] #292121
09/30/09 13:47
09/30/09 13:47
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
T
Toast Offline OP
Serious User
Toast  Offline OP
Serious User
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
Originally Posted By: EvilSOB
2> the sound of the splash is instant, no time delay as one would expect from an object 300-500 meters distant.
3> the splash sound is too 'soft', not the 'slap' sound of a solid object hitting water.

You can hear the water splash? I tried to for several times now but I hear nothing because the jet engine sound is just too loud...

Concerning the things actually hitting the water - well I can't really say too much about this because if you do some zoomed in stop-motion views you'll see that very much gets lost in compression artifacts...

Currently there is said to be a pilot saying that they really were there shooting something down. I'll see if I can get some trustable info on this...

Enjoy your meal
Toast

Page 14 of 15 1 2 12 13 14 15

Gamestudio download | chip programmers | Zorro platform | shop | Data Protection Policy

oP group Germany GmbH | Birkenstr. 25-27 | 63549 Ronneburg / Germany | info (at) opgroup.de

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1