Alberto: 300,000 visible polygons will be piece of cake for A7. You should be able to run your game even on older (as in 2-3 years old) PCs.

That sounds really nice. Already with the newest A6 update (50.4), I got a scene with aroun 100k tris running at something like 70FPS with a resolution of 1600x1200. All running on a Dell XPS M1710 notebook with Intel core2 Duo 2GHZ, 1GB RAM and a Nvidia Gforce go 7800gs
Really looking forward to A7

40 FPS

P4 2.4 GHz HT, 800mhz FSB (Northwood)
Radeon x700
2GB DDR/800mhz ram (dual bus)

-Rhuarc

A6.5: 65 FPS
A7: 80 FPS

Core 2 Extreme X6800 @ 3,33 GHz, 1333 FSB
2 GB DDR2-800
Radeon X1900XTX @ 700/800 MHz
XP Pro

5 FPS

Laptop:
P4 3.06 Ghz
512 mb DDR RAM
Mobility Radeon 9200

Pentium Dual Core 2,6 GHz
Geforce 7600GT 256MB AGP8x
Windows XP Home SP2
1GB Memory

30 fps with your compiled executable
xx fps with your source compiled A6.50.6 (test later)

Like the results, look better then I had with the Geforce 6600 (only 15fps), only still 7 frames short to match your score George. May I ask, is your card pciex? Or those extra fps come from the processor difference?

Thank you.

I've got an AGP card as well. The difference might appear because I have a clean windows installation, without lots of applications that slow it down, occupy the system tray, eat precious system resources, and so on. I don't even have a wallpaper - can you believe that?
Choose Start -> Run and then type msconfig and press Enter. You'll be surprised to see how many programs load at startup - disable the ones that aren't needed.

I don't have wallpaper, just blue color. Still have the XP theme for menus enabled that might take some resources and Norton IS 2007 running in the background. Also most services are disabled or set to manual on this system.

19FPS, AMD Athlon 2000+ XP, 1.6Ghz, 512SDRAM, GeForce 5200FX 256mb

impressive... most impressive...

Norton is slow, must be the reason ... I personally prefer Kaspersky, way faster,

Cheers