but this would be a wed replacement, and not a model aplication:

Because I don't think clothing and rag-dolling or materials are needed in the model editor, but that is my thought...

maybe i am completly wrong and just telling stupid and senseless things...

No worries, I think there is a little confusion
between where your WED-replacement is going,
and where I would like to see a MED-replacement go...

Same here. I don't see myself using GS ever again.i'm really gonna miss but even though im comftorble with lite-c i have to move on at some point.Just like when i moved on from GAMEMAKER to A7, its the same thing.

Med does not need to be replaced. Just the import options should be opened up to more formats.
It's good to have a tool which can do rudimentary stuff in the engine's native format.
It gives you a certain chance to fix smaller import glitches.

i just think GED and WED shouldve been one tool, kinda pathetic to have to have WED, MED, SED and GED open, i mean, wth?

what i think GS needs:
-reworked lighting
-merge WED and GED
-more light types
-radiosity [dnt even tell me we already have that because its slow as HELL!]
-more material properties

thats just my list, i wont list 'optional' features, just listing what i think new members would like, i wont complain about the physics and all that because physics as never given me a single problem

I would not replace Med either. Getting things to work in any native 3D game format can be very difficult. Med is a plus. If you take out Med, then you have to confront many different ways of making a model and how they get in the engine. Just the differences between the way that each version of a single 3D art package exports a single 3D format is mind numbing.

UMMM appear gamestudio is go to dead rest in peace

Wow, this is amazing. I did not read every post here, but I read the feature list of Unity3. It is like a dream comes true.

First, my harshest critic on Unity was the scene management and they just bought an industrial proven tool to solve this:
http://www.umbrasoftware.com/
If you want to integrate this into your 3dgs game, then you have to pay $30,000. Unity has it build in now.

Then it renders with new shader system, deferred lighting, hundreds of lights possible with shaders, fantastic.

And shadows: I always dreamt of a solution to combine static and dynamic lighting including shaders in a working professional way, to fake global illumination plus having dynamic lighting. It works now. They just included another industrial tool, Beast:
http://www.illuminatelabs.com/press/newsarchive/state-of-the-art-light-mapping.pdf
This would cost you $100,000, but it is integrated in Unity. Amazing.

And I dont have to pay extra, I theoretically can make game scenes look as nice as a rendered image/video now.

Besides that I dont have to code in C++ like I have to do in Ogre, Irrlicht, T3D or C4. I can use the way more comfortable C#.

To me it is a no-brainer, I have to order this. And when it got released then I will make some of our preview-images at Dexsoft in Unity3

This will be an exciting future.

I wish you much fun with your preview images in Unity3.

regards,
gri

Thank you gri. I am sure I will have. I always liked the idea to create static shadow mapping and I enjoyed it first in WED, then in Constructor and later in UDK. Now, together with global illumination, post processing and shaders it will just be the next level and I am looking forward to this.

And besides that I am looking forward to C# coding.