10a. 'I' wonder, how do 'you' accurately determine whether the entity is the same 'Nitro' referenced in memory.
(That is probably supposed to be a general question, and not so limited in scope, if suggested as such by awkward terms.)
Perhaps, THAT does not actually occur.
Maybe, good identity tagging doesn't matter at all.
'Individuals' in scope, are probably all the same in a sense anyway, but that is not meant to wholly point at a reason of matter or not.
Yes, it is a lie, THIS doesn't actually 'wonder', (not at all) and not more than THAT 'wonders' why for THIS, and maybe, 'truth'.
>>10a.
Tis a visually appealing model, or at least THIS seems to think so, however, potentially there are a number of disagreeable elements, but from THIS to THAT, why list them?
10b. Not in the mood to pick at its physiology anyway, but what of those with such enlightening utterances as
,
it's the same, self or THAT, but the lie of difference, it offers a momentarily simulation of interest, or worse, another illusion of that only simulated, but not well enough to be termed with such accuracy.
Pick, pick, but location plays obstacle, maybe...
'Mood' is kind of a stretch, as at this point, it's more messy, heaping, stinky slop byproduct left over from the series and stacking of old blinking temporal 'feel' routines. >> 10b.
But again, like a primate slamming the skulls of a peer, and itself, against a rocky protuberance, mechanically, rhythmically, (in broken step), the words of wisdom, so eloquent in the raw, blunt human element, cap it off well, or don't 'you' think s.ss..so...:
The 'alien' is not on a vacation with friends and family, correct?
Feeding appendages are not too close to optic organs, ...aye, THIS doesn't know.