|
|
|
2 registered members (AndrewAMD, VoroneTZ),
1,258
guests, and 4
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: soft body physics
[Re: zSteam]
#172270
12/20/07 12:18
12/20/07 12:18
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 582
Germany
Poison
User
|
User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 582
Germany
|
agree!!!
This is a must for 3dgs.
Cheers
Poison Byte
Everything is possible, just Do it!
|
|
|
Re: soft body physics
[Re: Hummel]
#172272
12/20/07 19:38
12/20/07 19:38
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,758
Antwerp,Belgium
frazzle
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,758
Antwerp,Belgium
|
Quite impressive, an equalivent to soft shadows but with a physical approach  Nice one  Cheers Frazzle
Antec® Case
Intel® X58 Chipset
Intel® i7 975 Quad Core
8 GB RAM DDR3
SSD OCZ®-VERTEX2 3.5 x4 ; HD 600 GB
NVIDIA® GeForce GTX 295 Memory 1795GB
|
|
|
Re: soft body physics
[Re: frazzle]
#172273
12/20/07 23:48
12/20/07 23:48
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 196
ambe
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 196
|
YES! this whould be lots of fun ^ ^
- code monkey
|
|
|
Re: soft body physics
[Re: Felixsg]
#172276
12/22/07 21:23
12/22/07 21:23
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,713
Lübeck
Slin
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,713
Lübeck
|
Quote:
Quote:
i'd like to have soft shadows rather than soft bodies.
"it is a must for 3dgs"... well, only 1 console game i know has comparable physics. it's not must, it's pretty advanced.
But the soft shadows are ready you can use
That is just not true.
Sure I would like to play around with soft bodies but I have the same opinion as broozer, that shadowimprovements are more important for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
