2 registered members (TipmyPip, AndrewAMD),
911
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
CEO's and COO's of game companies...
#132562
05/29/07 17:37
05/29/07 17:37
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 523 Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
Paul_L_Ming
OP
User
|
OP
User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 523
Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
|
Hiya. [SEMI-RANT] A while back (quite a while...) I think it was these forums where someone was talking about game publishers, and the Head Honcho's of game companies...and how they seem to be complaining more and more about "lack of income", or "too much gamer diversity/competition", etc. The seem to blame things on the gamers for some reason; if their game isn't selling its because the gamers are being unreasonable/stingy/etc., or (their most favoritistest of whipping boys..."pirates"). Now, I ask you. This is a quote from Reggie Fils-Aime, COO of Nintendo (America, I think). And he quotes: Quote:
"From our perspective, this industry is about entertainment and it's about driving a consumer interface and engagement with content."
I've read this time and time again...and I can't figure it out. Is this even english? What the hallibut does "...driving a consumer interface and engagement with content" even mean?
Maybe if the CEO's and COO's actually were even remotely interested in how their target audience talks or if they, themselves, picked up and played a video game, it'd help.
[/SEMI-RANT]
^_^
"We've got a blind date with destiny...and it looks like she's ordered the lobster."
-- The Shoveler
A7 Commercial (on Windows 7, 64-bit)
|
|
|
Re: CEO's and COO's of game companies...
[Re: fastlane69]
#132564
05/29/07 19:21
05/29/07 19:21
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,815 Finland
Inestical
Rabbit Developer
|
Rabbit Developer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,815
Finland
|
Translated to consumer-english:
"From our perspective, this industry is about entertainment and it's about driving a consumer interface and engagement with content."
"We think that Nintendo does his job to entartain gamers. We are giving ("selling") gamers products for their needs."
"Yesterday was once today's tomorrow."
|
|
|
Re: CEO's and COO's of game companies...
[Re: Inestical]
#132565
05/30/07 00:27
05/30/07 00:27
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
I think what he was trying to say was; "hey, it's stupid; we thought of and made all these wonderful games, but no-one is playing our *cough* refreshing and original *cough* games, which is sad because our brilliant *cough* games will take this kind of entertainment to the next level." I think it's bad judgment all together from that guy, did he even wonder what kind of games we would like or did he simply want to stubbornly release a game nobody might have bought even if it wás a good game?? Hehehe, if people want to make niche games, make sure there's a niche to begin with ... (by the way, I think Nintendo ís doing a great job with their games, some blame them to be unoriginal, although true to some extent, I tend to disagree when looking at the big picture.) Cheers
|
|
|
Re: CEO's and COO's of game companies...
[Re: A.Russell]
#132567
05/30/07 08:30
05/30/07 08:30
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 523 Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
Paul_L_Ming
OP
User
|
OP
User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 523
Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
|
Hiya. Yeah, after a couple reads, I figured he was trying to sound "extra-intelligent" for his share holders. Make them think his used of words somehow relates to his expertise with games. Here's my transalation: "We at Nintendo want to make games people find fun and engaging to play". Yeah. That sounds better.
^_^
"We've got a blind date with destiny...and it looks like she's ordered the lobster."
-- The Shoveler
A7 Commercial (on Windows 7, 64-bit)
|
|
|
Re: CEO's and COO's of game companies...
[Re: Paul_L_Ming]
#132568
05/30/07 08:42
05/30/07 08:42
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,815 Finland
Inestical
Rabbit Developer
|
Rabbit Developer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,815
Finland
|
It's not about what sounds nice and what not. It's just business language to make it complex to understand and a way to make consumers think "okay, I think I understand now let's translate this so it gives positive affection to me" where actually they ment that they don't sell good (or something) and then they had to make "official" publiciations of <insert minglemongle and new relase here>. just some rant about how business works
"Yesterday was once today's tomorrow."
|
|
|
|