ticks/no-ticks effect on backtesting

Posted By: kap

ticks/no-ticks effect on backtesting - 12/18/16 14:34

The strategy below generates suprisingly good test results on EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY.

So good in fact I set it up running against a demo account - actual results were very different.

I have since come across the TICKS parameter and the backtest results have been cured of their optimism.

It's not clear to me why TICKS had such a profound effect on the results (especially considering that I only have M1 data, not tick data). I am also wondering when - if ever - testing should be done without TICKS given the misleading results.

During testing what is the logic for simulating execution prices and times given entry stop & limit prices, stop prices and take profits?

-K

Code:
//
// no_ticks_skys_the_limit
//
	function run() {
	BarPeriod   = 30;
	Hedge       = 0;
	Weekend     = 2;
	StartDate   = 2010;
	EndDate     = 20160930;
	Lots        = 10000;

	vars prices = series(price());
	var  ema    = EMA(prices, 7);
	var  atr    = ATR(7);

	Entry       = -ema;
	TakeProfit  = atr*0.5;
	Stop        = atr*5;

	if (priceLow()  > ema && NumOpenLong  <= 0)	{ enterLong (); }
	if (priceHigh() < ema && NumOpenShort <= 0)	{ enterShort(); }
}



Code:
Test no_ticks_skys_the_limit EUR/USD

Simulated account   AssetsFix 
Bar period          30 min (avg 43 min)
Test period         05.01.2010-01.10.2016 (81755 bars)
Lookback period     80 bars (40 hours)
Monte Carlo cycles  200
Simulation mode     Realistic (slippage 5.0 sec)
Spread              1.1 pips (roll -0.10/-0.11)
Contracts per lot   1.0

Gross win/loss      41691$ / -16674$ (+28109p)
Average profit      3714$/year, 309$/month, 14$/day
Max drawdown        -263$ 1% (MAE -263$ 1%)
Total down time     47% (TAE 17%)
Max down time       27 days from Oct 2014
Max open margin     264$
Max open risk       348$
Trade volume        102405046$ (15202334$/year)
Transaction costs   -8846$ spr, -235$ slp, -8.53$ rol
Capital required    440$

Number of trades    9036 (1342/year, 26/week, 6/day)
Percent winning     87.7%
Max win/loss        33$ / -151$
Avg trade profit    2.77$ 3.1p (+5.9p / -16.8p)
Avg trade slippage  -0.03$ -0.0p (+0.3p / -2.1p)
Avg trade bars      1 (+1 / -5)
Max trade bars      43 (21 hours)
Time in market      20%
Max open trades     1
Max loss streak     4 (uncorrelated 4)

Annual return       845%
Profit factor       2.50 (PRR 2.40)
Sharpe ratio        9.33
Kelly criterion     10.31
R2 coefficient      0.890
Ulcer index         0.1%

Confidence level     AR   DDMax  Capital

 10%                900%   222$  413$
 20%                881%   236$  422$
 30%                872%   242$  426$
 40%                861%   250$  431$
 50%                855%   255$  434$
 60%                849%   259$  437$
 70%                843%   264$  440$
 80%                837%   269$  444$
 90%                826%   278$  450$
 95%                812%   289$  457$
100%                712%   386$  522$

Portfolio analysis  OptF  ProF  Win/Loss  Wgt%

EUR/USD             .999  2.50  7921/1115  100.0  
EUR/USD:L           .999  2.39  3886/585   47.2  
EUR/USD:S           .999  2.62  4035/530   52.8

Posted By: MatPed

Re: ticks/no-ticks effect on backtesting - 12/18/16 21:34

Hi, not an expert but with such tiny Stop and TakeProfit the simulation become unrealistic especially when the volatility is low. The accuracy granted by M1 bar is not enough.

Ciao
Posted By: Finstratech

Re: ticks/no-ticks effect on backtesting - 12/19/16 14:17

Try this on T1 data, you'll see more or less close to reality results. But if the results are overly optimistic, take it with a grain of salt.
© 2024 lite-C Forums