It is hard to find a religious biochemic while there are a lot of phisics who beleive in God

i wonder where you got that theory from.
its not true. a lot of scientists are religious. biologist or physics.

a nice idea about the "start of the univers" is the definition of existence.

for example our eyes can only see moving objects.
to be able to get input our eyes are moving very fast every second. so as soon as everything would stop or freeze we wouldnt see anything anymore.

now imagine the same sheme for "existence". we are because we move. if we stop we are no more.
so maybe like the infitity for time there is the infinity for possibilities and our existence is not defined by a time value but by the fact that we and our universe move corresponding to be able to exist within an infinitive web of "movements".

my biggest problem with the "creation" theory is the reason why. all of this "god created the time and the earth aso" sounds to me like somone got bored and decided to build something.

before arguing if god created everything i would like to know "why should he had done it?". and "becasue he is almighty" is not an acceptable argument.

if someone is almighty why create somehing so unimportant like physical existence.
ist any spiritual goal to lose the bounds of this existence to enter a universal level.
so if someone is allready at the finish line, why bothering to build a new start?

cheers