Thanks for the reply, jcl.
I did test the system with my broker's downloaded asset parameter at the very beginning and got a negative profit result.
So, I manually set spread, r/o, commission to 0 to see whether these costs reduced the performance. It got 39% of AR but still not close to 110% of AR, as described on the z system web page.
PIP and PIPCost are then the remaining 2 different parameters between my broker's and zorro default assetsFix.csv.
My broker's PIPCost, e.g. XAGUSD, is 100 times smaller than one in zorro's default asset parameter.
But my broker's PIP is 100 times larger than the one in zorro's.
I thought those difference shouldn't affect the result. Otherwise, AR% could be changed with different broker's asset parameter, since each broker has different PIP, LotAmount, and PIPCost of an asset.
But I could be wrong about something, I'm still new to zorro.
Last edited by ytc; 12/05/16 09:00.