can SAR() be more fully implemented?

Gamestudio Links

Zorro Links

Zorro Beta 2.61: PyTorch
by jcl. 06/10/24 14:42

New FXCM FIX Plugin
by flink. 06/04/24 07:30

AUM Magazine

Latest Screens

1 registered members (AndrewAMD), 1,529 guests, and 8 spiders.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Newest Members

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented? [Re: mustang] #446541 10/20/14 17:27 10/20/14 17:27
Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 27,987 Frankfurt jcl Chief Engineer
jcl Chief Engineer Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 27,987 Frankfurt	It's certainly easier to write a PSAR in lite-C than using the MT4 bridge for it. But for us there was no reason for implementing a PSAR in lite-C so far. We have not yet seen that it could be used for a profitable system.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
can SAR() be more fully implemented?	dusktrader	03/27/14 09:54
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	jcl	03/27/14 15:37
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	swingtraderkk	03/28/14 12:50
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	dusktrader	03/28/14 16:08
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	jcl	03/28/14 16:43
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	mustang	10/17/14 03:52
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	jcl	10/20/14 17:27
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	mustang	10/20/14 18:03
Re: can SAR() be more fully implemented?	jcl	10/20/14 18:20

Moderated by Petra