I'll be sure to read that soon. At the very least, it should be somewhat informative. But I have to be honest, stuff like this:
The reason that the invisible hand seems invisible so often is that it's not there. Markets are often not efficient.
does not make the interview sound very promising.
![laugh laugh](/ubb7/images/graemlins/default_dark/laugh.gif)
Ah, don't worry, that refers to a central notion of the pioneer of political economy, Adam Smith.
It meant that the competition of freely acting participants
that are only following their very own interests in a free market
'somehow magically' leads to the wealth of the nation, the wealth of all.
Look for "invisible hand" f.i. in the wikipedia article about Adam Smith for further information.